Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portrait of a labrador retriever.jpg

File:Portrait of a labrador retriever.jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2019 at 10:53:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Portrait of a labrador retriever.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Portrait of a labrador retriever.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  Info created by Dktue - uploaded by Dktue - nominated by Dktue -- Dktue (talk) 10:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Dktue (talk) 10:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - The random bit of red flower (?) below the dog's face is distracting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:39, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
  •  Comment I suppose it is the tip of the tongue, not a flower --Llez (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
    •  Comment It actually is the dog's tongue. --Dktue (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

• OK, that's not easy to see, because we see the tongue in the mouth, then part of it is blocked by the dog's jaw, and then a small piece of two-headed blurred red thing in the background. I think it makes the portrait less than ideal, but let's see what others think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:52, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Oppose Good quality and setting, but the background unfortunately is not nice --A.Savin 15:21, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good quality indeed, but the background is really disturbing, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unfortunately per above. Your camera is definitely capable of FP-level quality, and this would IMO be a deserved QI if nominated there. But the background is a bit cluttered and distracting for me. Cmao20 (talk) 18:47, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow for me, sorry. --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:15, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose It doesn't wow me and the background is blurry--Boothsift 03:25, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others.--Vulphere 05:03, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: with this many opposes, it looks like this nomination has gone to the dogs . Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.