Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Plage de l'Horloge.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2019 at 19:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
 Comment I completely agree with you that f/18 is not a good choice, especially on an APS-C camera (I would have used f/8 to f/11 on a “full-frame” camera). --Aristeas (talk) 08:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Kreuz and Poco a poco, please, take a look, I applied a selective denoise and selective sharpening. f/18 because I was looking to keep the beach and the bridge in the same plane. Thanks in advance for your reviews --Wilfredor (talk) 00:30, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sharpness is a bit better now but you cannot regain details lost in exposure by subsequent sharpening. The water surface has not been done a favour by sharpening, and I’m still not sold on the composition. If the bridge is the main subject (as I understand), it’s way too distant and too little visible of it. --Kreuzschnabel 06:49, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Bridge is only a element in the composition, the title is Beach Horloge (in french). --Wilfredor (talk) 07:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Version without the concrete steps at bottom

SHORT DESCRIPTION

  •  Info Because Eve Teschlemacher recomendation --Wilfredor (talk) 07:18, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Less is more :) this is much clearer. However  Oppose there are sharpening artifacts now all over the frame (foreground sand as well as the background bridge) and the cloning is poorly done (i.e. with visible traces), no this is not at all an FP to me for technical drawbacks. --Kreuzschnabel 10:01, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - Great improvement, much more relaxing to look at, but I'm sorry, I have to pull my vote from the other version and hold off here until it's clarified whether I'm looking at just wind or disturbing noise in the water. I'm talking about the small lines. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment How could this be wind? It’s on the umbrellas and in the sand as well. It’s sharpening artifacts – this image is hopelessly oversharpened in trying to save some detail from the unsharp shot at stopped-down aperture. --Kreuzschnabel 10:05, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I come from fix the excesive oversharpening and artifacts in the water, please, take a look --Wilfredor (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Wilfredor: Just as a hint: As far as I can see, the fix was applied to the first (uncropped) version, but not to this cropped one; it should be fixed, too. --Aristeas (talk) 08:55, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]