Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pinus lambertiana cones Cucamonga Peak.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Pinus lambertiana cones Cucamonga Peak.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 May 2010 at 10:55:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Mitch at Flickr - uploaded by MPF - nominated by MPF -- MPF (talk) 10:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - A very difficult species to get a good quality photo of the cones, as they are usually produced 30m or more above ground; cones at eye level like this is very rare. The cones are typically 30-45 cm long.
- Support - MPF (talk) 10:55, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special IMO, and I do not like background.--Mbz1 (talk) 15:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- The background shows the species' natural habitat well, which improves the value of the photo. And why 'nothing special'?? Can you do better? - MPF (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- I do not think you are quite ready to discuss FPC just yet. It does not matter, if I can, or I cannot do better. It even does not matter, if I took any picture in my life at all. The only thing that matters is that I stated my opinion, and even added the word "IMO" to my vote. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:29, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- The background shows the species' natural habitat well, which improves the value of the photo. And why 'nothing special'?? Can you do better? - MPF (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 16:19, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose overall quality --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Terrible composition and background. EV is not enough in Commons. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:49, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose glaring blown highlights, and per Alvesgaspar. --Dschwen (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Per Alvesgaspar Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 08:44, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:39, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 11:48, 21 May 2010 (UTC)