Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pantheon wider centered.jpg

File:Pantheon wider centered.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 11 Aug 2009 at 11:05:04

•  Info created by Ravedave - uploaded by Ravedave - nominated by IP
•  Support -- 74.63.93.220 11:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Ok, now I am confused, This is already a featured image! Julielangford (talk) 11:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
  • It's featured on the English Wikipedia, not on Commons. IMO, all the Wikipedias as well as Commons maintaining separate FP libraries (with significant overlaps) is one of the worst design mistakes of the entire system. I realize that Commons has special license requirements, but for the language editions of Wikipedia the separate lists are simply ridiculous ("Ahh, this is featured on English, Turkish, but not on German, so I could nominate it there..."). -- JovanCormac 11:56, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support By which I don't mean to say that I don't want this to be featured on Commons; I certainly do. -- JovanCormac 12:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Thanks for the clarification, and explanation. I'm new to the commons, so get a tad deranged on times :) Julielangford (talk) 13:10, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
  • I've made the same mistake myself more than once, when looking at other people's nominations and seeing only the brown box, thinking "what in the world is this person nominating that picture for?" -- JovanCormac 14:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful. --Calibas (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose No details in anything. The sculptures and the frescos are blurry.--Two+two=4 (talk) 15:42, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Paris 16 (talk) 16:34, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Durova (talk) 16:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Oversburnt parts, too small for panorama, not sharp enough. —kallerna™ 18:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:24, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose - lovely atmosphere, but people expect to be able to zoom in on a panorama, and this one is just too small. Downtowngal (talk) 00:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - very nice - Silver Spoon (talk) 10:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, Tintero (talk) 19:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support WOW --Pudelek (talk) 11:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Claus (talk) 12:05, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Luxembourg (talk) 05:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blurry and distorted. Maedin\^talk 16:28, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Wooo..! What's happening to FP? This panorama is about to get promoted while much better panoramas have been rejected for defaults a lot smaller than what is found here. The verticals lines are not even vertical, absolutly no details are visible, and the size is clearly substandard to other panoramas, especially when they are covering such a wide angle (both horizontal and vertical). --S23678 (talk) 21:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

result: 12 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral =>  featured. TonyBallioni (talk) 12:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)