Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maianthemum racemosum ssp. amplexicaule.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Maianthemum racemosum ssp. amplexicaule.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2024 at 21:21:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae
Info: blooming treacleberry; no existing FPs of the species. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:21, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Oppose 
Underexposed, insufficient DoF --Wilfredor (talk) 23:35, 4 January 2024 (UTC)- Support A little underexposed, but with these white-on-white flowers, it's very difficult to get the structure otherwise. DoF is fine for a normal flower photo, I don't think we should set focus stacking as a "standard" for FP plants. However, the file description and categories were bare bones to say the least. I have fixed that now. Please remember that you need all the data in the description field too, so that the search engines on Commons can find it easily for people doing searches for say "flowers in Canada". --Cart (talk) 09:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your fixes! --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:02, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think the DoF is that good. I agree focus stacking should not be the standard but I have seen a lot of non focus stacked pictures that were sharper than this. Overall I think it's a good QI, well composed and attractive but doesn't wow me either in subject or technical quality for FP. Sorry, I do like your work and think you are a v good photographer Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Support MZaplotnik(talk) 17:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 09:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
