Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leegheide-nahe-Glabbacher-Bruch-2015.jpg

File:Leegheide-nahe-Glabbacher-Bruch-2015.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Aug 2015 at 05:01:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Leegheide-nahe-Glabbacher-Bruch-2015.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leegheide-nahe-Glabbacher-Bruch-2015.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 05:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 05:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:34, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:38, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Interesting proportion but grassses on the bottom part are disturbing the composition. --Laitche (talk) 16:43, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Thanks, Laitche for your comment. The grasses are placed there on purpose. Classical foreground, midground, background composition. IMHO the photo would look worse without these grasses. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
    • I guessed grasses are one of elements but in this case light green (mid) ground is too little in this composition. If there are a bit more ground (midground), I would agree :) --Laitche (talk) 19:50, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose A nice composition and a good technical achievement but the subject is not worth a FP to me.--Jebulon (talk) 22:37, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Jebulon. While this avoids the usual pitfall of shooting almost into the sun, there are still some small blown areas in the clouds, and I'm not sure that the composition delivers enough to offset that. I don't like the crop on the cloud, for one thing, and Laitche is correct about the paucity of ground. Daniel Case (talk) 01:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
• I understand the intention of this composition. The trees in one line similar to a pearl necklace and the cloudy look interesting. But the tree on the left is disturbing the composition. The photographer should try a different placement here. --Wladyslaw (talk) 05:52, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:22, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I like the composition. --Tremonist (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per others. There probably is way too much of sky captured (like 4/5 of the picture?) and yet it has cropped clouds. Cropped tree doesn't help as well. Probably wrong angle... -- Pofka (talk) 14:10, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose as others. Yann (talk) 22:51, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Rainbow unicorn (talk) 21:25, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:35, 5 August 2015 (UTC)