Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kilimanjaro from Amboseli.jpg

File:Kilimanjaro from Amboseli.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2016 at 21:46:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kilimanjaro from Amboseli.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kilimanjaro from Amboseli.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
•  Info View of Kilimanjaro from Amboseli National Park, Kenya. Created, uploaded and nominated by Sergey Pesterev -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 21:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 21:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - quite beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Contemplative, quiet and peaceful. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support - Bijay chaurasia (talk) 03:03, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Nice --Don (talk) 04:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support The view is beautiful. Too bad the photo is only 6 megapixels. dllu (t,c) 04:54, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support lNeverCry 07:09, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 09:31, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support − Meiræ 10:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support — Draceane ^diskuse 13:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 14:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 16:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support------Isasza (talk) 17:51, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --cart-Talk 18:56, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose The motif looks wow, but considering the rather low resolution the image is too noisy and unsharp. --Milseburg (talk) 13:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but per Milseburg. Especially the sky is not really well managed: there is much noise (and also some dust spots). --A.Savin 15:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support >= 3K resolution are full ok for me. @Sergey Pesterev but please remove the dust spots. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
  •  Done I removed the dust spots. -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 08:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose per A. Savin. Daniel Case (talk) 07:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

* Oppose I want to support but the sky is too blown -- Thennicke (talk) 09:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)  Support Sorry, just got a new monitor, it was on the wrong setting. The "blown" highlights look fine now -- Thennicke (talk) 11:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 12:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 08:47, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural