Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Inside Balconies Cave at Pinnacles National Monument 1.jpg

File:Inside Balconies Cave at Pinnacles National Monument 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Oct 2009 at 17:48:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Inside Balconies Cave at Pinnacles National Monument 1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Inside Balconies Cave at Pinnacles National Monument 1.jpg

•  Info everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 17:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 17:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment ...Stiched? Why the resolution is then so low? —kallerna™ 11:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

It is an overlap. The thing is that there was very dark inside the cave, and when I took a single shot, the sky was very, very overexposed. So I ended up taking few shots with a different settings.HDR did not work because I've got the person only on one of the shots.--Mbz1 (talk) 12:36, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for explaining. :) —kallerna™ 17:00, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Support —kallerna™ 11:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Yann (talk) 17:59, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Karel (talk) 18:55, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The image doesn't really appeal to me. Also the grovel seems a bit overexposed and blurry. --NEURO ^⇌ 21:37, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:38, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like the person in the picture (snapshot-like feel). -- JovanCormac 09:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Well, that nomination of mine was opposed because there was no scale. Now I tried to do my very best to have a scale, and it is opposed again. Oh well...Let me please assure you that this image is anything, but "snapshot"--Mbz1 (talk) 10:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Support The person in the picture is necessary for to scale it. Jacopo Werther (talk) 17:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Idea and composition are ok but the post-processing is too obvious for me. --AngMoKio (talk) 12:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Of course I cannot argue with your observations about post-processing. The image(s) were very hard to take, and eve harder to post-process. Even to carry tripod there was a challenge. I found that image that could give you some idea how it was (I am not sure it is the very place I took my image) Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:50, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose I agree with AngMoKio. --Estrilda (talk) 05:31, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support interest--663h (talk) 12:26, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Per 663h; I study geology and we need better free pictures, like this one. Diti the penguin — 10:34, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose too post-processed. --Chrumps (talk) 16:19, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Per Diti --Imehling (talk) 17:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Berthold Werner (talk) 07:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena