Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gypful.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Gypful.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2013 at 15:54:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created & uploaded by Pierre Dalous - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 15:54, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Citron (talk) 15:54, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 16:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:22, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Stu Phillips (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Michael Barera (talk) 00:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Tomer T (talk) 03:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Kikos (talk) 07:30, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Poco2 09:06, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Ximonic (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Vamps (talk) 19:18, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Joydeep Talk 19:26, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Blurred Lines 14:24, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Very nice! -- Wolf im Wald (keb) 20:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
- Neutral I am not audacious enough to vote with oppose because the quality / level of detail is very good compared to similiar shots. But the background is unfortunate. The color of the (rock?) matches the color of the bird's coat -OK- but it somehow cuts the birds and distracts from the main motive. The missing separation of the bird from the background is most notably in thumbnail view. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
- The background show the natural habitat, it's a educational value. It's quite blurred for separate, IMHO.--Citron (talk) 12:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- I had not denied that it is the natural habitat. But from a photographic viewpoint the background is unfortunate. If the brown area had filled the complete background or if the whole body of the bird had been over the rock it had been much better. The way it is now the rocks (or whatever it is) cut the wings of the bird. It is the same as you cut a (human) head by a horizon line - a no-go for portayal shots. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:01, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support Could you please add the coordinates? Gyps fulvus can be found in different places in Spain. At least something approximate. --Kadellar (talk) 12:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Info On Gyps fulvus the uploader (Kookaburra 81 = Pierre Dalous) wrote it was (somewhere around?) Huesca. --Amga (talk) 07:59, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Böhringer (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
- Support @Tuxyso: natural habitats, and birds flying in front of rocks don't care about photographers & photographic viewpoints, btw... --Amga (talk) 07:59, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Your comment is not helpful. I would appreciate if you stick to the very content of my argument or to the photo. For details see your talk page. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:52, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Not at all a good background compared to File:Gyps fulvus 1 Luc Viatour.jpg ot File:Gyps fulvus 2 Luc Viatour.jpg. For explaining its natural habitat, we have pictures like this. I agree the current nomination too has its own merits (more detailed, legs visible, etc.) JKadavoor Jee 11:51, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks! At least one person who understood my point. If it is important or not is a matter of personal taste. From a compositional point File:Gyps fulvus 2 Luc Viatour.jpg is much better than the nomination here. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:10, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Not at all a good background compared to File:Gyps fulvus 1 Luc Viatour.jpg ot File:Gyps fulvus 2 Luc Viatour.jpg. For explaining its natural habitat, we have pictures like this. I agree the current nomination too has its own merits (more detailed, legs visible, etc.) JKadavoor Jee 11:51, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
- Your comment is not helpful. I would appreciate if you stick to the very content of my argument or to the photo. For details see your talk page. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:52, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Blurred Lines 15:21, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds