Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Green Chicago River on Saint Patricks Day 2009.jpg

File:Green Chicago River on Saint Patricks Day 2009.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2010 at 00:40:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Green Chicago River on Saint Patricks Day 2009.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Green Chicago River on Saint Patricks Day 2009.jpg

•  Info created by flicker user Boehmer - uploaded by Gage - nominated by Ktr101 -- Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator -- Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:40, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
• Doesn't this look somehow familiar? –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:22, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose. I already stumbled across this image a while ago. I don't like it at all. Overdone oversexed HDR in my opinion. Image quality itself is not impressive either. --Dschwen (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose My eyes!!! The goggles do nothing! --Dori - Talk 02:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:37, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Dschwen. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:53, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I'll be polite - per Dschwen --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose, this would be a hit on Flickr, but it should certainly not be a Commons FP because of the reasons mentioned by Dschwen. --Aqwis (talk) 10:34, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Dscwhen. Steven Walling 18:42, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support if this is what it really looked like. Did people throw paint in it?  Oppose if it has been dgitally altered. --MartinD (talk) 10:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

• In fairness, yes, they do dye the river green every year. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 13:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
• Yes, but the two only options here are not "They don't dye so the picture looks fake" and "They dye, so the picture looks real". There is option number three: "They dye, but the picture still doesn't look the least bit real". --Dschwen (talk) 15:46, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose -dont think it is that great -LadyofHats (talk) 03:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Fun to look at for a little while, but very overdone. Njaelkies Lea (talk) 11:40, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)