Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Geode mineral.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Geode mineral.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2010 at 10:57:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Cody escadron delta - uploaded by Cody escadron delta - nominated by Cody escadron delta -- Cody escadron delta (talk) 10:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Cody escadron delta (talk) 10:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose fpx. Snapshot, bad lighting (color cast), excessive whitespace, little detail and clarity on the subject, ittitating hair in the center. Nowhere near FP standard, sorry. --Dschwen (talk) 11:31, 21 May 2010 (UTC)- Oppose per Dschwen. --Cayambe (talk) 11:38, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose such steady shots allow much more elaboration in the setting of the subject, the lights and the background. Especially the black line is the cause of my "oppose"-vote (albeit I think that's not a hair but the shadow of an edge of a paper sheet used as background). Try more lights and set them wisely, place your geode on a single sheet of paper of a greater size and be careful about the white and colour balance in the postprocessing next time, a better image could be the result. :-) Greets, Grand-Duc (talk) 12:30, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose main object max. 15% and the rest: nothing. Sorry to far from a FP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:27, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:01, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 05:19, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose bad lighting, poor framing. --Elekhh (talk) 00:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality. fetchcomms☛ 21:08, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:50, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
