Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Festung kufstein sk.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Festung kufstein sk.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Mar 2010 at 14:25:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded, nominated by -- Simonizer (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Support another time, another place, another try ;-) -- Simonizer (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2010 (UTC)- Support Very nice place, well done photo --George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Doucus (talk) 19:57, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good composition. --Elekhh (talk) 20:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support Amazing. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 21:15, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support frisch --Böhringer (talk) 21:40, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:26, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Nice photo, but the left part have problems (look at the left side of the cliff). --Ankara (talk) 08:18, 21 March 2010 (UTC)- Oppose Blurry on left hand side, also some distracting poles. —kallerna™ 10:29, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I'm not a huge fan of the composition on this one. I'd have placed the castle (or whatever it is) slightly more to the top right corner (rule of thirds ?) - Benh (talk) 20:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- That would have been a different image. This one shows the mountain dominate the landscape (and occupy 2/3 of the image). --Elekhh (talk) 20:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't agree with you as the mountain blends a bit too much with the sky, so we can't talk about mountain dominating the landscape being the main subject in my opinion. Also there's a bit of room above that mountain to move upright the castle a bit. - Benh (talk) 21:00, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- I agree that this composition with dominating mountain is good. - Tupungato (talk) 11:51, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose due to quality on left hand side. Was the right side cropped? Perhaps a different focal length would have produced better results (might have needed a stitch though). --Dori - Talk 22:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
- Support I like the composition and the quality issues (blurry left side - unimportant, minor sky artifacting) considering the image resolution are minor. -- Tupungato (talk) 11:51, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality problems at the left side --Dein Freund der Baum (talk) 23:42, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose- From the master of composition, this one seems a bit below the usual high standards. What I don't like is the mountain serving as background of the building. I'm not very found of the cropped buildings in the foregorund either. Finally, the image quality is not exthe best. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:45, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /–Juliancolton | Talk 16:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
