Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Enrique Simonet - La autopsia - 1890.jpg

File:Enrique Simonet - La autopsia - 1890.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2015 at 09:58:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Enrique Simonet - La autopsia - 1890.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Enrique Simonet - La autopsia - 1890.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
•  Info painted by Enrique Simonet - uploaded by Smkrsw - nominated by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Info Great wow to me --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--Mile (talk) 14:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:00, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support--LivioAndronico talk 17:04, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Question There is no source for the author of the photograph. Is it acceptable ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

• For me oui...--LivioAndronico talk 17:17, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

• Yes for for too! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:42, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Good queston Jebulon. As far i see they dont have obligation to name autor of photo, but original author (creator) or the art made. So no credit to photographer in this case, i suppose. I whish this could be made clear. Acceptable, probably yes, moral, no. --Mile (talk) 17:48, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

• Certainly .... the developer of the framework is reported ... in this case is sufficient for me--LivioAndronico talk 17:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Oppose Sorry, I just have to oppose to a submitted photograph without named author.--Jebulon (talk) 21:12, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

• I must say that a worst reason for voting against I do not think you could find--LivioAndronico talk 21:54, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

• Btw there is no photographer name to this nomination, what is the difference? --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:41, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

• Yes, the photographer is Mister Google.--Jebulon (talk) 09:42, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

* Yes, but who is Mister Google. ;-) --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:07, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Support In this case the authorship should go to the painter. Just about any competent photographer can and should produce this quality or reproduction. There is no "signature" to the photographer, just a plain old photographic reproduction of a work of art. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 03:18, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Pugilist (talk) 10:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:25, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 06:50, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Smnt (talk) 04:25, 4 July 2015‎ (UTC)
•  Conditional oppose No color-space metadata and no embedded color profile: Windows and Mac browsers and apps treat colors randomly (even on a calibrated monitor). -- Slaunger (talk) 20:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @Slaunger: Fixed. Yann (talk) 19:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
    • Thanks, Yann! -- Slaunger (talk) 19:51, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
      • Thanks, also from me. Yann --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:13, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:37, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media