Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Didgeridoo street player.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Didgeridoo street player.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2012 at 17:27:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Noel Feans - uploaded & nominated by Tomer T (talk) 17:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Neutral Excellent composition and lightning. But I am not sure about the color.--Claus (talk) 18:13, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Can you be more precise? Tomer T (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Ximonic (talk) 20:36, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Is the contrast too high? The colours do not look right to me, otherwise fine. Snowmanradio (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- I tried to improve it a bit. Tomer T (talk) 22:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Question What has happened to the colour? Snowmanradio (talk) 12:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- The contrast was reduced and the saturation was also reduced a bit. Tomer T (talk) 12:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment What has the Flickr photographer done to the image? I suspect that this image has been processed by the Flickr photographer and as a consequence this image should not become an FA, because of excessive processing. The same Flickr photographer seems to modify a lot of his images; see this highly processed image of a car. Snowmanradio (talk) 13:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- I saw that he does processing in many images (that shouldn't disqualify all his images). I don't think the processing in this image is so harsh. After my edit, I don't think color manipluation is signifcant. Tomer T (talk) 13:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- I am not the first person to comment on the colours in this image. Snowmanradio (talk) 13:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- I know, I have nothing against you... I didn't see comments referring specifically to the edited version. What do you think about its colors? Tomer T (talk) 13:31, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- I am not the first person to comment on the colours in this image. Snowmanradio (talk) 13:29, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- I saw that he does processing in many images (that shouldn't disqualify all his images). I don't think the processing in this image is so harsh. After my edit, I don't think color manipluation is signifcant. Tomer T (talk) 13:14, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Comment What has the Flickr photographer done to the image? I suspect that this image has been processed by the Flickr photographer and as a consequence this image should not become an FA, because of excessive processing. The same Flickr photographer seems to modify a lot of his images; see this highly processed image of a car. Snowmanradio (talk) 13:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- The contrast was reduced and the saturation was also reduced a bit. Tomer T (talk) 12:17, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Question What has happened to the colour? Snowmanradio (talk) 12:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- I tried to improve it a bit. Tomer T (talk) 22:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support I like the levels here. Also, good composition without distracting elements. - A.Savin 22:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Info Old version was restored. The edit was uploaded in a different file, and shown as alternative. Tomer T (talk) 11:59, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Being picky I'd go for a version in between :) However I do like the composition overall so Support --Herby talk thyme 17:33, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Either, but leaning alt. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support both; prefer original. They usually wear colorful, eye catching cloths. Jkadavoor (talk) 06:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Ggia (talk) 08:50, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Alt version. This is a very good picture. Nice composition, nice angle. --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed flickr stuff. พ.s. 05:53, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wetenschatje. Good composition, technically OK, but the colour saturation is unneeded and ugly. --Claritas (talk) 17:37, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- In both versions? Tomer T (talk) 17:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- No, the second version is much better, but there are still issues with overexposure in the background, I'm Neutral. --Claritas (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- So please change your first vote Tomer T (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- As I understand it, we're voting on the first image, not the alt. My position is quite clear to anyone who counts the vote. --Claritas (talk) 10:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- The vote is on both of them, see this for example. Tomer T (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- As I understand it, we're voting on the first image, not the alt. My position is quite clear to anyone who counts the vote. --Claritas (talk) 10:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
- So please change your first vote Tomer T (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- No, the second version is much better, but there are still issues with overexposure in the background, I'm Neutral. --Claritas (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- In both versions? Tomer T (talk) 17:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed. • Richard • [®] • 18:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Support Alt. --Jovian Eye storm 13:37, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People
The chosen alternative is: File:Didgeridoo street player-2.jpg