Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crocodylus-krokodilskopf.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Mar 2011 at 19:08:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by H. Krisp - uploaded by H. Krisp - nominated by H. Krisp -- H. Krisp (talk) 19:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 19:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Comment 4 pictures in one scientific overview H. Krisp (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)- Comment There are several making errors / dust spots, but can be removed (see annotation) --Llez (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you! I removed the dust spots H. Krisp (talk) 19:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 22:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Request can you remove the CA please? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)- Comment Hello Alchemist-hp, sorry, I´m a hobbyphotograph. Can you tell me what you mean with CA please? Thank you very much and many greetings
- CA = Chromatic aberration. Alchemist, please remember that not everyone knows what this means! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:58, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- SupportA great looking picture--Breawycker (talk) 01:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support High EV, nice composition. Steven Walling 04:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support -- Marmoulak (talk) 04:45, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support Good.--Ankara (talk) 09:22, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Strong oppose For a scientific overview, all images should be to the same scale and have the same white balance! W.S. 10:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)- Oppose per W.S. --99of9 (talk) 11:21, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose WS has good point here. - Benh (talk) 12:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you very much for the critical comment! I know what you mean but a same scale is in a paper not really necessary! Normally scientific journals want to see under each picture a scale. If you want, I can make such a scale but to my mind those things disruptive the picture because my intention was only, to take a nice scientific photo that showed many details of a skull of a juv. crocodylus sp.. Thank you and many greetings H. Krisp (talk) 17:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- I think the biggest issue is the white balance consistency. - Benh (talk) 21:00, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- sorry, but: Oppose per W.S + technical inadequacy: white balance + chromatic abberation. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Oh, now I understand WS and CA. Thank you very much H. Krisp (talk) 06:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)- Comment Scale on the image is not necessary, but the scale of the subimages has to be the same:
Version 3
[edit]
W.S. 09:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment I tried to make the picture a little bit better :o) H. Krisp (talk) 18:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Why did you use pixels and not something like centimeters? -- IdLoveOne (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- Is that not obvious? How am I going to use cm when no indication of size is given on the original? W.S. 07:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, never mind then. I thought an alternative with a scale was being added. I see this is merely for demonstrative purposes, though IMO it was obvious to me that the images already weren't in the same scale. -- IdLoveOne (talk) 20:04, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Hi W.S., sorry that I upload the new version with no comment (see above) but my withdraw is correct: I think the picture isn´t good enough for a featured picture. Now I try it again in the category quality images (I found the category this evening :o)). Thank you very much and many greetings H. Krisp (talk) 19:48, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Is that not obvious? How am I going to use cm when no indication of size is given on the original? W.S. 07:56, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Why did you use pixels and not something like centimeters? -- IdLoveOne (talk) 19:21, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /IdLoveOne (talk) 20:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
