Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clifton Beach 2.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Clifton Beach 2.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period ends on 6 Oct 2009 at 04:05:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Noodle snacks -- Noodle snacks (talk) 04:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Noodle snacks (talk) 04:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Question Is this image unaltered? I've never seen blue fog before... -- JovanCormac 06:33, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Not fog, water with a long exposure. It is a graduated blend between two exposures but that is about it. The colour appears to be a combination of a reflection of the sky and the considerable white foam from the swell (it is a surf beach). Noodle snacks (talk) 07:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, Support. That should be noted in the image description though as to someone who doesn't know the place it sure looks like fog. -- JovanCormac 07:32, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Not fog, water with a long exposure. It is a graduated blend between two exposures but that is about it. The colour appears to be a combination of a reflection of the sky and the considerable white foam from the swell (it is a surf beach). Noodle snacks (talk) 07:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Tilt (horizon). But mostly, this is more of a personal taste, I feel the composition would have been so much better if there was a greater contrast between the sky and the water (with colors or clouds). --S23678 (talk) 09:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I also wondered, if it was water or fog. IMO, if one is not sure about that, it means that the image is overprocessed. Besides I do not like blue color between the rocks. Sorry.--Mbz1 (talk) 09:58, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Not a case of processing, just a long exposure (30 seconds) and waves breaking. Noodle snacks (talk) 10:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I wonder, if it is possible to see the original image? I mean the waves are breaking only ashore, around the rocks, but all the water looks the same, and it does look as a blue fog. If I am to see the original, I might change my vote. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- For what it's worth I was there on the day and the colours seem accurate based off my images. Flying Freddy (talk) 16:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Question You were at this exact spot on the very same day Noodle snacks took that picture? -- JovanCormac 20:01, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- For what it's worth I was there on the day and the colours seem accurate based off my images. Flying Freddy (talk) 16:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I wonder, if it is possible to see the original image? I mean the waves are breaking only ashore, around the rocks, but all the water looks the same, and it does look as a blue fog. If I am to see the original, I might change my vote. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Not a case of processing, just a long exposure (30 seconds) and waves breaking. Noodle snacks (talk) 10:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Not much EV but great artistic shot. --Muhammad (talk) 12:40, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support--Babyaministraor (talk) 20:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Good, but not that good. —kallerna™ 16:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results: