Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cirque de Mourèze, Hérault 23.jpg/2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cirque de Mourèze, Hérault 23.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Feb 2014 at 18:25:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info A dolomite rock in a funny shape sculptured by the erosion. Mourèze, Hérault, France. All by Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Comment The other with off-center composition is imo much better. --Ivar (talk) 18:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- This is one was my first choice, Saffron Blaze, A.Savin, Jee, Jebulon, Colin, what can I do? I must wait the end of the nomination to nominate the other choice or I nominate it as an alternative? -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- I would support the second choice --A.Savin 19:36, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- I supported the other image ! Answering your question : according to the rules, you must have only two active nominations. In my opinion (which seems shared enough), the other image of the same object is not an alternative, but another nomination. So you have to wait the end of the process of your first current nomination (étang de Thau), or withdraw one of them before nominating any other candidate. That is what I think. --Jebulon (talk) 20:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Concur with Jebulon as to process; and with A.Savin as to which of the two similar images I would support. Saffron Blaze (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
- Withdraw, make another fresh nom, withdraw, make another fresh nom, ...., ....., ...., till one get promoted or reviewers loss their patience (which comes first).
02:28, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Saffron Blaze, A.Savin, Jee, Jebulon. As I told it Jee, I consider good to lead the nomination of my first choice to its term and I will, I have make simply this to illustrate the fact that there is no rule in the guide. IMO the inscription of just this sentence : "Only an edited version of the original nomination can be considered as alternative." would be the simplest, the least ambiguous and the best way to put everybody all right. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:16, 01 December 2014 (UTC)
- Only an edited version of the original file nominated can be considered as alternative. could be good for me (even if I'm against the existence of "alternatives" since I'm here all around.)--Jebulon (talk) 11:43, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
- Saffron Blaze, A.Savin, Jee, Jebulon. As I told it Jee, I consider good to lead the nomination of my first choice to its term and I will, I have make simply this to illustrate the fact that there is no rule in the guide. IMO the inscription of just this sentence : "Only an edited version of the original nomination can be considered as alternative." would be the simplest, the least ambiguous and the best way to put everybody all right. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:16, 01 December 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:29, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
