Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Church and rainbow in Akureyri.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Church and rainbow in Akureyri.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Sep 2015 at 15:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:29, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Oppose The rainbow itself is nice, quite strong, it almost looks too intense, but the foreground (road, signs,...) spoils the composition IMHO, sorry Poco2 17:34, 25 August 2015 (UTC)- Oppose nice, but no FP --Atamari (talk) 20:30, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco. I want an image like this to be a featured picture. The church is beautiful. The rainbow, especially against a land background, is as beautiful as it is rare. But unfortunately two beautiful things together do not automatically add up to an even more beautiful thing combined (per Circle of Iron: "Two birds tied together have four wings, yet they cannot fly"). Besides, the road in the foreground adds some extra distracting clutter. Daniel Case (talk) 20:36, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Works for me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:57, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support It's an extraordinary photo with a rainbow this intense! The church as foreground works as a composition for me, too, as it does for King. --Tremonist (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support nice, absolutely --Shuhrat Sa'diev (talk) 11:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support What Villy Fink Isaksen could do? Relocate the rainbow? Great mood. I cahnged the FP category to Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:20, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
- He could clone out the disturbing signs and poles...--Jebulon (talk) 18:36, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Question @Jebulon: How? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:52, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment I don't know whether it is a FP or not. But I'm strong against such a practice 
. Reality is reality! Independently of I would crop it 16:9. Then at least the lower road sign would be away. --Hockei (talk) 18:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment What is reality ? Philosophycal question... In postprocessing, just remain honest and don't deceive the (re)viewer--Jebulon (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Done cropped to 19:9 --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:24, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Done again - a new and a better crop! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Yes! I find the crop very good and It is a good quality picture. Anyway, I don't know if FP, sorry. --Hockei (talk) 16:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 22:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
