Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cane cutters in Jamaica.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cane cutters in Jamaica.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Oct 2009 at 02:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created by unknown author (1880s) - uploaded and nominated by Dmitry Rozhkov -- Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 02:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support -- Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 02:15, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
NeutralInteresting scene, but quality is not very good: blown highlights. Yann (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)- Support Yes, much better. Yann (talk) 00:08, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Support That picture is almost 130 years old. Plenty good enough given the age. -- JovanCormac 09:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)Oppose On second thought, the original image at [1] really does have significantly better quality. In fact, I'd rather see the original, un"restored" version Featured than the candidate. Maybe desaturation was a little overzealous? -- JovanCormac 09:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)- Support Much better now. -- JovanCormac 12:38, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Contrast/brightness have been returned to original now. --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 12:19, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support --NEUROtiker ⇌ 21:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support If it really is from the 1880:s the quality is totally amazing.--Korall (talk) 00:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support Excellent! --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:27, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support ■ MMXXtalk 02:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support very nice quality -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 08:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Support --George Chernilevsky (talk) 05:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry but the image has very poor quality (maybe not for its time but A image shouldn't be nominated just becauses its 130 years old) The Article Creator (talk) 20:58, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical