Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campo flicker (Colaptes campestris) female.JPG

File:Campo flicker (Colaptes campestris) female.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2015 at 09:48:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Campo flicker (Colaptes campestris) female.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campo flicker (Colaptes campestris) female.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
•  Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 05:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- good capture, but with much noise Merops (talk) 05:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Very good,in every way --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 07:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice colours, but more noise and less sharpness than similar shots of similar birds. Especially unfortunate because the chroma noise would be easy to correct. — Julian H.^✈ 08:20, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  • @Julian Herzog: Better now? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
    • @ArionEstar, @Charlesjsharp: Too much in my opinion, the feathers and the trunk lost a lot of detail. — Julian H.^✈ 10:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
      • less NR now! Charles (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
        • Look at the variation in the yellow feathers around the neck, most of that gets lost. Sorry for not being specific enough in the comment above. It's a tradeoff with the background noise, of course. — Julian H.^✈ 11:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Chroma noise reduced. Charles (talk) 10:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  • @Charlesjsharp: Could you add location in the description? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  •  Done Thanks. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Qualified support Nothing wrong technically and nice pose, but I'd like to know a little more about that apparent golden-tinged light. Was the sun filtered through turning leaves or something? Daniel Case (talk) 15:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
  • No, photo was taken at 4pm in typically beautiful Pantanal late afternoon light. Similar to this image that one editor said was over-saturated. Charles (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful little fellow! --Tremonist (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support But I would prefer more room at the left side and less at the right side. --Hockei (talk) 17:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support but as Hockei --Hubertl 11:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds