Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek 04 - climbers.JPG

File:Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek 04 - climbers.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2010 at 16:50:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek 04 - climbers.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Adršpašské skály (Adersbacher Felsenstadt) by Pudelek 04 - climbers.JPG

•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 16:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 16:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Onno Zweers (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support some chromatic aberrations, but otherwise very good in composition and quality. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 19:41, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support This new version with CA removed--Jebulon (talk) 21:02, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 23:23, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Sorry, but neither the composition or the quality are convincing. What we see is not enough for getting a precise idea of what is going on. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 01:50, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
  • Climbers...--Jebulon (talk) 11:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
    • Yes, but climbing what? Could be a rock on the beach or a tiny detail of a very high mountain. There is no sense of scale in this picture. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:48, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
      • I don't understand what you mean with "no sense of scale". Two men seems to be a good scale to me, I don't need other "scale", and what is really this rock face doesn't not matter IMO. The texture of the rock is nice, the light is good, the compo looks dynamic enough to me... Concerning scale: do you think that this picture without sky, and then only with rock (a contrario) should be more acceptable, for instance ?--Jebulon (talk) 10:20, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
        • I agree with Alvesgaspar. I can't tell how high up they are. Is this a small plastic climbing wall or a thousand-foot high mountain? So I have to vote  Oppose too. Sorry, --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:55, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
          • A small plastic wall ? I've never seen a so big small plastic wall. Very funny.--Jebulon (talk) 23:44, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
            • Adršpašské skály (Adršpach-Teplice Rocks) - yes, this is "certainly" the same plastic --Pudelek (talk) 11:50, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
      • @Jebulon: The High Fin Sperm Whale explained almost exactly what I meant, better than I (excepting the "plastic thig" idea...) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:46, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree with Alvesgaspar. Athyllis (talk) 12:42, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose we need to see the top of the pillar IMO. --99of9 (talk) 13:57, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mbz1 (talk) 03:07, 23 November 2010 (UTC)