Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Funchal. Madeira. Portugal-21.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2016 Funchal. Madeira. Portugal-21.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Sep 2016 at 20:21:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
- Info created by lmbuga - uploaded by lmbuga - nominated by User:lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 20:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination -- Lmbuga (talk) 20:21, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think this one works either. Daniel Case (talk) 20:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately, I have to agree with Daniel. Good view but no FP. cart-Talk 21:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for such scientific consideration. It not due to my surname is another? Thanks.--Lmbuga (talk) 21:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for such scientific consideration. It not due to my surname is another? Thanks--Lmbuga (talk) 21:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Automatic tranlation, in my English I would say: I'm not important, as other users--Lmbuga (talk) 21:28, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- I hope Google translate won't alter my words, but you've been roughly trying to pass three similar pictures but in my view, none of them addresses the main issue which is lack of wow and lack of a strong pattern in the composition. They all seem a bit random. So no, I don't think the opposes are due to your nickname. - Benh (talk) 21:36, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Now, Benh, it's the same: Not worth trying to find out what you say (es ¿Que más da lo que opines?). Thanks folk--Lmbuga (talk) 21:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- If you want a scientific explanation, let me quote the advice I got from User:Diliff when the panorama of my home town was 'Opposed' here at FPC: "Cityscapes often are busy by nature, but not in such a way that each element competes with the others- there's usually something unified about a good cityscape; a sweeping view, a single architectural style, converging lines, etc. Anyway, just my opinion." This was actually very good advice, this photo has none of these elements. --cart-Talk 21:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Interesting W.carter, thanks; but not worth for this picture IMO--Lmbuga (talk) 21:48, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
- I shall (or will) think about the question. Thanks (Diliff is a reference for me)--Lmbuga (talk) 22:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Español: No vuelvo a perder tiempo con una foto. Esto no compensa. Nunca más--Lmbuga (talk) 22:11, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /INeverCry 23:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)