Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011-06-23-erck-rickmers-by-RalfR-5.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:2011-06-23-erck-rickmers-by-RalfR-5.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2012 at 09:37:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by me Ralf Roleček
Support good portrait. Tomer T (talk) 10:43, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
OpposeUser:Andrew J.Kurbiko2:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Question why?--Martin Kraft (talk) 12:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Kraft (talk) 12:25, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Question why? --mathias K 14:16, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Info Because it meets the guidelines and is just a good portrait ;)
- I raised that question in the vote bevor, because IMHO it's just a matter of fairness, to give reasons when you decline somebody else's work or nomination. --Martin Kraft (talk) 13:05, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support per TomerT, but I'd prefer it scaled down a bit. - A.Savin 15:50, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support very good pose --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:25, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose lacking sharpness, visible highlights, unnecessary use of ISO 200, no wow. (compare: same camera model, same light setup, same location, different lense: File:Kersten Artus IMG 6154 edit.jpg) Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 12:39, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- With 21MP resolution, unsharpness in full view almost doesn't matter. - A.Savin 18:41, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Katarighe (Talk) 21:27, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
- Support per Savin Jkadavoor (talk) 02:08, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose As Peter Weis--Miguel Bugallo 13:33, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- weak support still to sharp for me, but good enough for FP. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:24, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 13:53, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: People
