Commons:Deletion requests/screenshots for the proposed Controversial Content system

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshots for the proposed Controversial Content system

[edit]

Contain copyrighted third-party logo.--Nardog (talk) 12:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Request to replace: It is still very controversial despite File:English Pokémon logo.svg was kept after the deletion debate (actually no consensus at all since 2 keep votes and 2 delete votes in the debate), the regulation about the copyright of fonts/typefaces are complicated and different in different countries and different laws. So at least no need to show these controversial pictures in all language versions of a most viewed referendum these days. It is recommended to have them all replaced by obvious free images (or deleted then do the replacement in all page of meta:Image filter referendum). I see the uploader User:Jorm (WMF) has already agreed to delete them all, so it should be easy more to delete or replace them. --Tomchen1989 (talk) 03:59, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept.

It is well established policy that anything that is pure text is PD. It does not matter if the font is simple or complex, or if the text is in a straight line, arced, or in a circle -- pure text is PD.

Note to User:Tomchen1989. DR comments are not votes. Policy is that they simply advise and inform the closing DR. The closing Admin is perfectly free to disregard all the comments, although, of course, he or she must have a good reason for doing so. Referring to the comments as votes is misleading. In any case, the count at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:English_Pokémon_logo.svg was three  Keep and two  Delete -- you forgot to count the closing Admin.

     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]