Commons:Deletion requests/WW plastic models

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=WW plastic models|year=2024|month=October|day=12}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||WW plastic models|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/WW plastic models}} at the end of today's log.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

WW plastic models

[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:German Infantry 1916.JPG. --Jean-Fred (talk) 21:28, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Si ces uniformes sont les uniformes officiellement utilisés, il n'y a la dedans aucune œuvre de l'esprit, par contre si ces équipements sont une invention du musée alors oui, il y a copyright du créateur de mode. Il y a peu de chance que le créateur de mode ou le musée viennent dire qu'ils ont inventé une œuvre qui aurait juste un lointain rapport avec la tenue des soldats de la WWI. --P@d@w@ne 07:36, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Français : Si historicair a obtenu l'autorisation de prendre les photos et les mettre sur Commons, on peut peut-être obtenir un ticket OTRS (des gens que ce soit une oeuvre collective du musée / une oeuvre d'un membre du musée) et donc régler cette histoire ?
English: If historicair had the oral authorization from the museum to take pictures and upload them on Wikipédia, we might be able to have an OTRS ticket from them
.Léna (talk) 08:20, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The referred DR was about the « model of a personn » (aka plastic guy), not the uniform.
So this is about the rights of the 'sculptor', authorization of the museum (even if nice) is irrelevant in this case. (Moreover, historicair mentions "permission to use on Wikipedia", which is not enough for Wikimedia Commons). Jean-Fred (talk) 08:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the 'sculptor' might be the museum. Léna (talk) 09:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kept - Jcb (talk) 14:40, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]