Commons:Deletion requests/Vicond's uploads

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Vicond's uploads|year=2025|month=January|day=03}} to the description page of each file.
Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Vicond's uploads|plural}} ~~~~
Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Vicond's uploads}} at the end of today's log.

Vicond's uploads

All the images as a gallery

The only images uploads by the user that are not nominated are:

These images were all uploaded by Vicond (talk · contribs). I am nominating these for deletion as not being realistically useful for an educational purpose – they are mostly uploader's various experimentations in art. There's really no shortage in the type of content these images cover. --Quibik (talk) 12:59, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well… First that all, I wonder what you considered by “experimentations in art”.Whatching your very strict selection, I suppose that my performance of Bach are not on that category, following your own criterium. However my Orchestra´s examples seem to be included there... Can you be more specific on this point please?

On this particular case, from the start I had clearly on my mind what I can draw or compose, so they are not experiments. On that way I thought that could be a good idea to upload all these files like many others user’s uploads of photos and drawings in Commons to exemplify the specific theme (category) on they are included right now. Honestly, today , I don’t see nothing wrong on that.

Vicond (talk) 19:19, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have somewhat misunderstood my criterion here. The emphasis is on educational (see Commons:Project scope). The selection was not based on any sort of artistic merit. I suggested to keep the Bach samples as they might be useful as an example of Bach's work. Similarly, the Anabel López images might be used to illustrate an article. I don't believe the rest of your uploads are simply realistically useful. There is absolutely no shortage of artistic depiction of females and female nudity on Commons. We have plenty of works in that vein by artists whose works are inherently notable due to the authors themselves. All this aside, I don't mean nothing bad of your work. I just think that there are better places to host your artwork (Flickr or deviantART perhaps). —Quibik (talk) 14:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, some of my files has been used eventually in wikipedia like right now is File:Adolescence.jpg, not much, but has been used. On the “educative point” I believe that have send too ,unless for me.Among other things, I drew some types of girls, students, a bit of architecture and notable people of my country that I believe ,could serve to know and appreciate some characteristics of my people and culture. Asian girls, are mainly, a serie of some neutral examples of classic nude drawings ,(despite the asian characteristic) that could serve (why not?) to show, some basics elements of that matery. Of course I respect the works of the others famous artists that are there. Even I self ,put in the past, a great quantity of the nude drawings created by notables artists that are there now, looking for them in many places in commons. But now, I don’t understand what’s going on for you with my drawings, when commons have a lot of photos, pictures and drawings that are not and or don’t have to be necessarily created by notables artists, even professionals.(?). Vicond (talk) 20:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope Jcb (talk) 19:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was absolutely absurd and out of polite.No real concensus or votation about it.So, who deside the rules here? Vicond (talk) 02:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I kind of agree. I did not expect these to be deleted without any third party opinions. But I guess Jcb found the case to be clear enough. —Quibik (talk) 11:16, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Vicond's uploads

Vicond's uploads

Navigation menu

Search