Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-USGov-NARA
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This template is similar Template:PD-LOC and must be deprecated. Images from NARA can be in PD, but not all of them. This is more source tag, than license tag. Alex Spade 11:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- So that's not a deletion request, but a request to change the wording, no? ~ trialsanderrors 20:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- First. Template must be deprecated or deleted, the problem is not in wording. Second. The main question is in that, should we delete images with this tag and without any other Commons-suitable license tag at one moment. I think, yes, Delete. Alex Spade 14:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Template, but Check all images against the NARA database before deleting them. Those images which the NARA database says are free of restrictions should be kept and re-tagged, not deleted indiscriminately. Andrew Levine 04:29, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Yes-yes. My previous phrase isn't fully correct. The NARA-image must be re-tagged in first, and in second those of theme which can't be re-tagged with another Commons-suitable license tag must be deleted. Alex Spade 04:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Agreed that this template should be deprecated; it should be replaced with a combination of {{NARA-image}} and an accurate licensing tag on images that use it. I would expect that the large majority of the images are in fact PD though, so I don't think there should be a rush to delete images that use it. It will probably take a long time to go through all the images, but it would be good to deprecate so that more images do not use it from now on. Carl Lindberg 06:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- How should I re-tag eg Image:Margaret Truman at national convention.jpg.[1] This picture comes from trumanlibrary.org which is part of NARA. All pictures there which are restricted have a tag "Copyright Restricted Image".[2] Vints 11:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I am of opinion that this image must be deleted. There isn't clear information about its status at original source.Alex Spade 15:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)- I think that the same thing applies to the Presidential libraries as to NARA's website, that is, as Bradipus says, the photos are PD unless they are specifically tagged. If I check "Exclude copyright restricted photos from search" in the search page and search for Margaret Truman, this picture will appear. This must mean it's PD.Vints 07:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- You are right. This checkbox can be very usefull for proof of PD-status, because it attends at weblink as parameter restricted=. [3] Alex Spade 12:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- I emailed NARA and they said this picture is of undetermined origin so I think it has to be deleted after all. They have three categories: unrestricted, undetermined, and restricted. The pics have two web addresses, one with this information and one without. In this example they are http://www.trumanlibrary.org/photographs/displayimage.php?pointer=2127&people=Truman%2C+Margaret+%28Mary+Margaret%29%2C+1924-&listid=6 and http://www.trumanlibrary.org/photographs/view.php?id=2127 respectively (id is 2127). The first, which doesn't have the information, appears in search. I will go through the pictures in Harry S. Truman and mark the ones that are undetermined with {{Delete}}. By the way how do I re-tag pics which are unrestricted? Vints 12:18, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- This was their reply: "Photographs that are indicated to be of undetermined origin are ones for which we have no information regarding photographer or ownership. We will provide the photograph to you, but you would use it at your own risk. We can only tell you that we don't have any copyright information on the picture. If the image is called unrestricted, it is definitely in the public domain. I hope this answers your questions. The photograph about which you inquired is undetermined, so you would be using it at your own risk." Vints 12:25, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- You are right. This checkbox can be very usefull for proof of PD-status, because it attends at weblink as parameter restricted=. [3] Alex Spade 12:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- I think that the same thing applies to the Presidential libraries as to NARA's website, that is, as Bradipus says, the photos are PD unless they are specifically tagged. If I check "Exclude copyright restricted photos from search" in the search page and search for Margaret Truman, this picture will appear. This must mean it's PD.Vints 07:22, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete the template. Rather than check immédiately all images (might be difficult), a practical solution is to replace with PD-US-Gov tag plus some kind of sign or warning that the next person who uses the picture should control that the tag is correct by checking on the NARA's website. Most of the material there is PD and if not, the material will be specifically tagged there. Bradipus 11:15, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete A claim by any source except the copyright holder is not an indication for the actual copyright status. --Rtc 18:04, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- An accurate vote for deletion. We should avoid copyright paranoia: most of these images are PD indeed, so there's no need in hurry, let's check them with no time pressure. Dr Bug (Vladimir V. Medeyko) 11:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This template may or may not be stupid. Forrester 20:19, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This template creates more problems than it helps. --ALE! ¿…? 22:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I have seen that in trumanlibrary.org, many images have "Restrictions:Undetermined", which means the copyright status in unknow, which means these pictures shouldn't be uploaded to Commons. Vints 07:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as it is a misleading copyright tag. --Tom (talk - email) 17:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Template was deleted from En-Wiki. Alex Spade 08:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - may be in PD, or not? this template is meaningless. Wooyi 02:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep instead of deleting the tag, it should be just reworded to say it shouldn't be used for new images, like some of the other deprecated tags, maybe it could give a list of alternative US PD tags to use. In spite of what the nominator said, National Archives is very different than the Library of Congress, LoC collects material like other public libraries and so nothing is guaranteed to be PD, whereas the National Archives is mostly US government material or donated material with the exception of some 'seized collections' from WW2, which the admins here are pretty quick to delete so that is a moot issue. Madmax32 11:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I think we should add a note saying that images uploaded after such-and-such a date using this tag will be speedy-deleted, sort of how en.wiki deals with no-source images. Without that, there's no particular closure on the use of it, and it'll keep getting used from now until doomsday. grendel|khan 20:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - deprecate it and reword it per madmax. --Evrik 09:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Keep Strong keep. --Vineyard 19:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)This is not a vote. Please submit arguments. --ALE! ¿…? 19:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
I have reworded the template, to indicate that this template should not be used anymore, and that it will be deleted once it has been orphaned. Images uploaded after 14:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC) can be considered to have no valid license. -- Bryan (talk to me) 14:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)