Commons:Deletion requests/Template:MMP-Katowice
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
This template seems to be an advert for a web site. I am not sure it's useful. --ksfan 19:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It's not an advert, it's information about who has gave permission for making photos during festival! --WarX 20:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Like above, i don't think it's advert. By they courtesy we have a lot of great photos, so it's ok to gave information who gave permission. Herr Kriss 20:26, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep ^/\^ M@rcin Suwalczan [talk] 20:27, 27 March 2007 (UTC) this template is very wanted, this template is essential M@rcin Suwalczan [talk] 20:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - this sort of information is not only good manners, but can also be required by the licence if we consider MMP a co-author of the images. Mr Kesfan, quit being disruptive! // tsca [re] 20:31, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This record label (MMP) is the owner of rights for making any records (i.e. pictures) from events organized by them. So according to license, they should be mentioned as those who relased that rights and allowed a digital recording of an event. Masur 20:35, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It is important that all media are properly attributed to all their (co-)authors, hence it is required to mention MMP on the image's page. Moreover, why duplicate large portions of code over many pages? That's what templates were invented for. Cheers, Миша13 20:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not "being disruptive" and at no point did I try to suggest that the the source of images should not be credited. What I am meaning is there's a perfectly adequate source field on the standard Information template that everyone else uses. I don't understand why this specific web site or organisation needs special treatment. The style of the template gives the impression of an advert to me. I think the information in the template could be more appropriately and discretely placed into the source field as other contributors do. --ksfan 21:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Anyway, link to their site is not needed and probably should be removed. --kb 14:26, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Request closed. No support for deletion. // tsca [re] 14:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)