Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Copyheart

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:Copyheart

[edit]
  • By its own admission, it is probably not legally binding, see www.copyheart.org.
  • We require that licenses be irrevocable, see Commons:Licensing#Acceptable_licenses, point 4, "The license must be perpetual (non-expiring) and non-revocable." The copyheart license says nothing about being non-revocable.
  • Keeping it as a template on Commons will mislead people into believing that it is an acceptable license.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep silence is not a reservation of right of revocation. it's about as clear as non-lawyers could make it: nothing misleading here. if you allow the GFDL which clearly does not apply to photographs, how can you not allow peoples' custom licenses? Slowking4 ♡ Farmbrough's revenge 22:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep And by the way this debate should not be in a deletion request since it is a broader debate about which licences are acceptable for commons. Léna (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Revocable licenses are not acceptable on Commons. Until Copyheart meets the requirements the template can't be hosted on Commons. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:24, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:Copyheart&oldid=300121376"