Commons:Deletion requests/Template:BeeldbankVenW
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
The stated release on the image page doesn't seem to be equivalent to {{Attribution}}. Patrícia msg 21:43, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Keep template:Beeldbank is used on hundreds of files. A nomination for one of them is hardly the way to challenge it. -Nard the Bard 02:45, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- You are correct. At the time I nominated the image, I did not notice that this was a template (I thought it was "{{Attribution}} + additional info". So, I extend this request to the template and images tagged by it. Patrícia msg 12:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- I tagged the template and moved this request to a more appropriate name. Patrícia msg 12:48, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- You are correct. At the time I nominated the image, I did not notice that this was a template (I thought it was "{{Attribution}} + additional info". So, I extend this request to the template and images tagged by it. Patrícia msg 12:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
OK, I've been asked to explain in more detail why I think this template has problems. The wording is "[...] No extra costs are associated with copyright, although it is mandatory to acknowledge the source with each publication". I think that uses such as production of derivative works is not explicit. I'll be happy if I'm wrong... Patrícia msg 13:18, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Delete no statement about modification >> not a valid license for us. Forrester 20:50, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
Comment Administrator who decides here should also deploy his decision on Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Doorgaand spoorviaduct Bleiswijk.jpg. Thank you. Forrester 20:50, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'll send them an email. I dont expect a fast response. Multichill (talk) 23:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Keep the template. Free enough. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:21, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep The licence says: Free to use without any restriction besides commercial use, in that case is attribution required only. "Free to use" gives no restriction in modification. --Stunteltje (talk) 15:41, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- Keep The statement on the website mentions that there are no extra costs associated with use of the material, except for attribution (this is slightly different from Stunteltje's reading). This implicitly assures that modification is allowed. Lymantria (talk) 08:34, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Kept. My reading of this is similar to Lymantria's; I suggest a discussion that invites more input (village pump, COM:L talk page, etc.) might be a good idea to further clarify this. Giggy (talk) 01:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
