Commons:Deletion requests/Rózsavölgyi Gyöngyi

Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Rózsavölgyi Gyöngyi|year=2024|month=December|day=18}} to the description page of each file. Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Rózsavölgyi Gyöngyi|plural}} ~~~~ Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Rózsavölgyi Gyöngyi}} at the end of today's log.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rózsavölgyi Gyöngyi

• File:Lantos_Piroska_(2).jpg
• File:Kérem_a_következőt.jpg
• File:Árnyék_és_fény.jpg

The photographer has requested that we delete these three files (see Ticket#2022071310002901) as she misunderstood what the standard permission boilerplate means when she sent it to us (in Ticket#2021100110003436) and did not actually intend to put them under a free license - she is selling these images for money and would like to continue doing so. --Tgr (talk) 19:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

Ha a kép készítője kérte a törlést, akkor törölhetőek a fotók. --Jávori István (talk) 19:18, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Keep - we do not know what have happened which resulted these reactions (we got multiple similar requests), but without expressively examining the reasons - and to prevent further possible misunderstanding I'd say the images shall be kept until the request is proven to be valid. It is well possible that the images were used illegally without honouring the license conditions, and the solution is not the deletion of the images but to enforce the license. --grin ✎ 22:11, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

---

Kept: per ticket permission. if permission is invalid, clarify with VRT. --Krd 09:07, 4 December 2022 (UTC)