Commons:Deletion requests/Quark structures of Edguy99
Quark structures of Edguy99
[edit]- File:Neutrondownupdown.PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Neutronupdowndown.PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Hydrogenprotium.PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Hydrogendeuterium.PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Hydrogentritium.PNG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
These are attempts by User:Edguy99 to visualize quark structures of the neutron, the proton, deuterium, and tritium. There is no way in which this approach might make any sense in nuclear physics or particle physics. The images are only used on the user pages of en:User:Edguy99. These images are not educational, and therefor out of project scope. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
I disagree. The page en:User:Edguy99/Nuclear_Physics is meant to illustrate the legal way quarks can be combined in simple molecules starting with hydrogen. This representation clearly shows the legal arrangements, provides a simple visual way of checking quark combinations and hence falls within project scope. These pictures are a very important part of the page.Edguy99 (talk) 23:45, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep, I don't know much about particle physics but if these images symbolize how quarks logically combine to form other particles then in my opinion they are educational and would be in scope and should be kept. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- For educational representations see for example the page Proton. The drawings by Edguy here are nonsense, just his own inventions, without any correspondence to reality. His stuff shows up in categories like category:Neutron, which is only confusing. Please:
Delete /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:34, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Ack to Pieter. --Leyo 09:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Delete I donna understand those pics, and I can imagine most of the persons either. In that form not acceptable! --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Comment Is this way of depicting the elementary composition of atoms common in physics? I have never seen it before (admittedly I am not a physicist). --NEUROtiker ⇌ 08:53, 17 August 2009 (UTC)- Delete Ack to Pieter. --Kein Einstein (talk) 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was to delete. Edgar181 (talk) 20:27, 22 September 2009 (UTC)