Commons:Deletion requests/Portrait photos uploaded by Wpcpey

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait photos uploaded by Wpcpey

Odd (or at least not divisible by 8) pixel size – certainly not from a camera. The first five also look to be cropped from the same, larger photograph or mural. May we see at least one source photo? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

• File:Chin Ka Lok 201809.jpg – 555 × 792 px, bizarre artifacts withdrawn
• File:Jordan Chan Siu Chun 201809.jpg – 528 × 886 px, bizarre noise withdrawn
• File:Jerry Lamb 201809.jpg – 798 × 1239 px, strange interposed details suggesting that the original is a mural or painting also withdrawn
• File:Eric Tsang Chi Wai 201809.jpg – 506 × 802 px withdrawn
• File:Yasuaki Kurata 201809.jpg – 319 × 515 px withdrawn
• File:Angela Tong 201809.jpg – 906 × 1245 px, also doesn’t look like a live photo fixed and withdrawn

All the pic are taken in the same event by same camera, but if I zoom too close it will not clear, so I cut it from software, please see the original pic for File:Eric Tsang Chi Wai 201809.jpg & File:Chin Ka Lok 201809.jpg]], and I cut for it

original pic for File:Eric Tsang Chi Wai 201809.jpg

original pic for File:Chin Ka Lok 201809.jpg

• for File:Yasuaki Kurata 201809.jpg see
• for File:Angela Tong 201809.jpg see

--Wpcpey (talk) 12:51, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

I am satisfied with uploader’s answers about four images and withdraw them (without prejudice for nominating again separately). Two images remain under deletion. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Jordan Chan Siu Chun is also found standing on Golden_job_premire_20180918-Chin_Ka_Lok_no_cut.JPG and withdrawn. All that remained now is Jerry_Lamb_201809.jpg. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

• for File:Jerry Lamb 201809.jpg see, just a fashion items on Jerry Lamb's body. But it is strange if I remove the background of the stage--Wpcpey (talk) 14:51, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

  Actually, the background—if present—may be problematical because theoretically makes the photo a derivative work. But the question currently is not about background. Neither https://imgur.com/a/2KRMGJZ nor https://imgur.com/a/Hgy14GD (the source for Yasuaki Kurata) are true photographs taken directly from a camera. Both were edited – it is especially evident on Hgy14GD which bears signs of heavy generation loss, but I’m sure 2KRMGJZ was edited as well. Where are the originals? As for “fashion items on Jerry Lamb's body”, can we see another photo—not necessarily Wpcpey’s—of Jerry Lamb on the same event? It would prove definitely that Jerry Lamb was really present, not manufactured of plywood. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:23, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Actually this is the original photos already, I use the digital zoom function when I take the pic, so the quality may look "edited". It seems that I don't take the picture without the plywood background. see--Wpcpey (talk) 15:29, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

W42Vvml shows generation loss as heavy as Hgy14GD, if not worse. Don’t use this garbage zoom function – shot raw sensor images for important photos. If your camera doesn’t let you do it, then don’t buy such hardware. If your retailer convinced you that the camera is good but it can’t shot raw-sensor-data photos, then don’t buy from this retailer. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:00, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

---

 Kept, Withdrawn – explanations are convincing. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 16:00, 27 September 2018 (UTC)