Commons:Deletion requests/Laurelle Mehus
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Also:
- File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum, Pivot Point International Inc.9.jpg
- File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum, Pivot Point International Inc.8.jpg
- File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum, Pivot Point International Inc.7.jpg
- File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum, Pivot Point International Inc.6.jpg
- File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum, Pivot Point International Inc.5.jpg
- File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum, Pivot Point International Inc.4.jpg
- File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum, Pivot Point International Inc.3.jpg
- File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum, Pivot Point International Inc.10.jpg
- File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum, Pivot Point International Inc.1.jpg
- File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum Pivot Point International, Inc..jpg
Images are not used in any project; were uploaded under dubious copyright license; and the subject of the photographs has requested they be deleted. See this discussion on en. ONUnicorn (talk) 19:33, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. It's a useful gallery, and en:wp discussions are irrelevant here. If the images are deleted, we can request speedy deletion without needing a separate DR. Nyttend (talk) 13:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Keep I see nothing "dubious" about the OTRS ticket. It contains a PDF of a formal CC license on the appropriate corporate letterhead. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laurelle Brooks Mehus Courtesy of Design Forum, Pivot Point International Inc.4.jpg for the previous DR on these files.
- We very rarely delete images at the request of the subject and never at third hand. The only reason we delete such images is when there is a privacy issue, but in this case, the images are from a professional photo-shoot, including a magazine cover, so the subject can not claim any privacy issues exist.
- If Laurelle Mehus thinks these images should be deleted, she herself can send a message to OTRS, but I doubt very much that such a request will be honored. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Keep. Odd: I did comment here but my text seems to have disappeared. Anyway, I agree with Jim's analysis. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:47, 15 February 2015 (UTC)