Commons:Deletion requests/Israeli money (2007-03-03)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Israeli money

[edit]
  1. Image:100 old Shekel bill.jpg
  2. Image:Einstein paper money.jpg
  3. Image:Israeli Lira 1968.jpg
  4. Image:0.5 NIS coin.jpg
  5. Image:1 Israeli Lira coin.jpg
  6. Image:1 NIS coin.jpg
  7. Image:1 old Agora coin.jpg
  8. Image:1 old Shekel coin.jpg
  9. Image:10 Agorot coin.jpg
  10. Image:10 NIS coin.jpg
  11. Image:10 old Agorot coin.jpg
  12. Image:10 old Shekel coin.jpg
  13. Image:100 old Shekel coin.jpg
  14. Image:25 old Agorot coin.jpg
  15. Image:5 Agorot coin.jpg
  16. Image:5 NIS coin.jpg
  17. Image:5 old Agorot coin.jpg
  18. Image:5 old Shekel coin.jpg
  19. Image:50 old Shekel coin.jpg
  20. Image:Almog IL3 Israco.jpg
  21. Image:Israele 1 agorot.JPG
  22. Image:Israele 10 agorot.JPG
  23. Image:Nis 1 sheqel.png
  24. Image:Nis 10 agorot.png
  25. Image:Nis 5 sheqel.png
  26. Image:Nis 50 agorot.png
  27. Category:Money of Israel kept --ALE! ¿…? 14:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Category:Bills of Israel kept --ALE! ¿…? 14:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Category:Coins of Israel kept --ALE! ¿…? 14:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli money is copyrighted --Cat Chi? 23:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment I think the whole copyright thing on currency is silly. We must take a step back and remind ourselves the ultimate reason why the concept of "copyright" exists. It exists because people that make money from creativity, like writers, actors, composers, or even computer programmers can actually make a living without worrying about their output being copied without getting their due profit. Now, if I copy the images of currencies 1000 times, does that hurt whoever the engravers/designers are? NO! The state paid them already and that's it.
Providing encyclopedic content should be the first priority. Copyright is only a constraint, not a goal. Everyone knows about {{PD-old}}. The nominator, of all people, should be even more aware of it. By nominating something as old as 1888 suggests that the nominator is confused about what our priorities are here on Wikipedia. --Chochopk 09:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep regarding copyright of money, it exists (if it even does) to prevent forgery. As such the exact laws that I'm generally aware of (of course it varies from country to country) is that you are allowed to make copies, but they either are not allowed to be high enough resolution to be used as forgeries (which none of these images could be used for) or the can be of very high resolution/quality but it must otherwise be clear they are not real (for instance I have a million dollar note, obviously nobody could seriously believe this note is real! Thus it is fine, even though it is copied elements from real notes). Mathmo 11:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per discussion above. Yann 15:53, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]