Commons:Deletion requests/Images uploaded by the Duke of Geography

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Images uploaded by the Duke of Geography|year=2024|month=October|day=16}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Images uploaded by the Duke of Geography|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Images uploaded by the Duke of Geography}} at the end of today's log.

Images uploaded by the Duke of Geography

[edit]

After reading a WR post by Delicious_carbuncle, I feel that we need reopen the case started at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Woman_with_hirsutism.jpg. A copy of a full-size, uncropped version of File:Woman_with_hirsutism.jpg can be found at this location. Expanding on what Delicious_carbuncle says, it appears to be a photo of a photo (or a page cut out of magazine) tacked onto a bulletin board. It seems that we were too quick in dismissing Peteforsyth's magazine observation from the previous deletion discussion.

As Delicious_carbuncle notes, File:Hyper1.jpg, File:Hyper2.jpg, File:Hyper3.jpg, File:Hyper4.jpg, and File:Hyper5.jpg were originally from a medical journal. The article in that journal doesn't mention any photographer named "John Parker". The article also contains the following:

Acknowledgment: The authors are very grateful to the patient who gave them written consent for this publication.

Did Wikimedia receive the same written consent from this patient to use these images? The HyperX.jpg images don't link to or mention the dermatology.cdlib.org article.

Delicious_carbuncle also noted that all of Duke of Geography's football-related uploads have been deleted as copyright violations (eg. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]). Duke of Geography lists him or herself as the author in these deleted images, and he also lists the HyperX.jpg images as "Own work". Given his or her history, can we really trust what this person says when it comes to attribution? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Good research. The journal issue was published in 2006 -- definitely, before the upload to Commons. Trycatch (talk) 21:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nom. Clearly copyvios / see previous Duke of Geography uploads / likely patient consent issues re. medical journal copies Alison 19:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]