Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Microcline variety Amazonite Potassium aluminum silicate Klienspitzkoppe Area, Nambia 2846.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Image:Microcline_variety_Amazonite_Potassium_aluminum_silicate_Klienspitzkoppe_Area,_Nambia_2846.jpg
[edit]It's a picture without any quality and there are enough better pictures of amazonite in the category. Ra'ike Diskussion 20:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Keep in project scope. With all the copyvios and whatnot, bad pictures of minerals are not high on the radar. -Nard 20:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)- Keep Better have many different images to identify.--Tomia 21:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Delete on this picture is noting to identify because its without any quality (its an eye pain not a picture) --Jom 21:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)- Delete If we'd have many images to identify, we'd have images that help us doing so. This one doesn't, it's only a collection of coloured pixels which resemble a stone. --Eva K. tell me about it 21:54, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wow. The stone enthusiasts are out in force for this one. -Nard 22:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Actually not that bad, even though we have better images at Category:Amazonite. To Nard: see Bilder mit "unsäglicher" Qualität löschen?... Lupo 11:41, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- KeepNot great, but PD and usable. --Simonxag 21:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Quality means more than "usable". Actually, this image is not really usable. --Bjoern 00:41, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep --TwoWings (ID confirmed on my talk page) 86.67.47.77 14:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. __ ABF __ ϑ 15:25, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Image:Microcline_variety_Amazonite_Potassium_aluminum_silicate_Klienspitzkoppe_Area,_Nambia_2846.jpg
[edit]
The Image was recent deleted one time by me after the last request because of its quality, wich is much to lousy. There are enough Images this can be replaced with. After a short undeletion discussion it was restored and i dont think this is okay. __ ABF __ ϑ 13:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep The quality wasn't that bade. I upload a reworked version of that image. I think this is a better one. ChristianBier 13:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep there was not enough consensus, IMO, to merit deletion the first time round. I don't see much wrong with the image. Lewis Collard! (talk, contribs, en.wp) 14:06, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Keep I would say, based on the discussion above, I don't think deleting the image in the first place was ok. In quality issues, follow consensus. Lupo 15:10, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
