Commons:Deletion requests/Image:ANPE10B.sized.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Licence does not seem compatible with Commons. It's strangely worded, so I prefer not to speedy delete it. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see what's wrong with it. The permission text reads "authorized for commerical use (publication). Please add reference to Conaie" (the creator). It requires attribution only, which is acceptable for Commons. Chick Bowen (talk) 19:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- I don't understand what "authorized for national and international media of communication" means. Is it restrictive or not? Does "professional use" mean "commercial use"? What about modification? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 06:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
- "Medios de comunicación" means "mass media." I read "publicaciones" as a gloss of "fines profesionales," meaning that the image can be published. It is strange wording, I agree, but it seems to allow commercial use with the sole requirement of attribution. It doesn't mention modification (i.e. derivative works) one way or the other; I'm not sure if derivatives would generally be considered allowed unless specifically not mentioned or the other way around. Chick Bowen (talk) 01:30, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- I'll ask a Spanish speaker to write them a mail and check this out. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- "Medios de comunicación" means "mass media." I read "publicaciones" as a gloss of "fines profesionales," meaning that the image can be published. It is strange wording, I agree, but it seems to allow commercial use with the sole requirement of attribution. It doesn't mention modification (i.e. derivative works) one way or the other; I'm not sure if derivatives would generally be considered allowed unless specifically not mentioned or the other way around. Chick Bowen (talk) 01:30, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
- I don't understand what "authorized for national and international media of communication" means. Is it restrictive or not? Does "professional use" mean "commercial use"? What about modification? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 06:42, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Deleted. There must be explicit permission for any use, not just publications, plus modofication Badseed talk 02:26, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
