Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by WeaponizingArchitecture
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by WeaponizingArchitecture (talk · contribs)
[edit]Both of these images were created to disrupt another project. One of them arguably has a death threat in its name. The other demands that the user be unbanned from the semi-official Wikipedia Discord server. Neither of these files has any potential to be used in a non-disruptive way.
Susmuffin (talk) 01:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Susmuffin: instead of outright deleting the first image, how about we rename it. It was NEVER supposed to be a death threat. I was going to use that image on my Userpage. Please move it to "File:WikiSistersRobloxManFace.png" or something like that, For the second one, I put it there as a stupid joke i thought was funny. Im starting to get fed up with 60 bazillion talk page messages about files i was using on my userpage. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 03:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Keep and Rename the “die etc.” one— it’s just the Wiki-sisters with goofy faces edited on them, nothing offensive or disruptive about that. Just call it “wikisisters kuso” or something relatively innocuous like that. 
Delete on the other since it’s blatantly disruptive and a misuse of the format (text-only image) Dronebogus (talk) 12:27, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep 1, Delete 2. File 1 could be renamed to WikiSisters, file 2 should prob be deleted. I see it grossly inappropriate to, even out of frustration, write on your user page that you were banned from Wikimedia Discord. It implies that the user's sole purpose might be to cause disruption. I get it is out of frustration as well (see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Userboxes/Discord - Wikipedia), but, and I apologize if I sound blunt, if a user got banned or blocked from a Wikimedia or Wikimedia-affiliated platform (whether on or off wiki), and they do not understand why so they can submit an appeal, then it is an indicator that they are prob not ready to participate in that specific Wikimedia/Wikimedia-affiliated platform. Aasim 15:10, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If i was only here to cause disruption, i wouldn't be going out to random cities for skyline shots. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 06:21, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- I’ve requested renaming the wikisisters image. Dronebogus (talk) 18:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
- Renamed, though under criterion 2 (meaningless name) rather than 5. --bjh21 (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: file#1, deleted file#2; per user:Dronebogus. --Wdwd (talk) 10:44, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files uploaded by WeaponizingArchitecture (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Fictional US state
- File:Seal of Michiana (Sandbox).svg
- File:Flag of Michiana (Sandbox).svg
- File:Michiana Map (Sandbox).png
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 01:47, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep These files are for a specific sandbox of mine. In fact it literally says in the file names "Sandbox". It's also worth asking why are they being requested now? I uploaded them in August of 2021, and they seemed to have been okay. I haven't added anything to the sandbox in ages, but I don't understand why they suddenly need to be deleted.
- WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 04:28, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Media that just pretends to be regular encyclopedical content is sooner or later detected as a hoax and subsequently deleted. In this case, you left the files uncategorized. Someone slapped the map into the "unidentified maps" category. And while I am trying to sort the stuff that was thrown into that "lucky bucket", what I encounter constantly are series of the weirdest fantasy maps usually with assorted heraldry (from the 2094 US elections over Minecraft kingdoms up to Great Caribbean Pirate Empires). Frankly, fictional heraldry+maps are not within Commons:Scope unless there is some educational angle to them, so this is one of my standard approaches. I'd suggest you should categorize all your made-up stuff under Category:User page images and put disclaimers that they are made up. That doesn't magically bring them into scope, but every contributing user is allowed to have a few personal or meta files flying around as long as they are clearly marked as such and don't go overboard. --Enyavar (talk) 14:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t think you get the point that these files were never used, or intended to be encyclopedic content. There are plenty of files on Commons like, say Personal CoAs that are used on stuff like Userpages. Should those be deleted? No of course not. Don’t request their deletion when it comes down to Categories of all things. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 18:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think you got my point either. Files used on your own userpage? Often okay, just not always. Here I don't see how a sandbox counts as your user page. IMO users are responsible to rigorously keep fictional POV or personal files from circulating in the main, encyclopedic parts of Commons. You may feel singled out, but I'd apply these standards to anyone else's stuff when I notice it. You may view my user page, too :-) --Enyavar (talk) 22:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- My guy they aren't circulating the encyclopedic parts of commons. Again, this apparently came down to Categories, so i guess ill add them. At this rate I really dont give a damn if they're deleted. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 17:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don't think you got my point either. Files used on your own userpage? Often okay, just not always. Here I don't see how a sandbox counts as your user page. IMO users are responsible to rigorously keep fictional POV or personal files from circulating in the main, encyclopedic parts of Commons. You may feel singled out, but I'd apply these standards to anyone else's stuff when I notice it. You may view my user page, too :-) --Enyavar (talk) 22:34, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t think you get the point that these files were never used, or intended to be encyclopedic content. There are plenty of files on Commons like, say Personal CoAs that are used on stuff like Userpages. Should those be deleted? No of course not. Don’t request their deletion when it comes down to Categories of all things. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 18:11, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Media that just pretends to be regular encyclopedical content is sooner or later detected as a hoax and subsequently deleted. In this case, you left the files uncategorized. Someone slapped the map into the "unidentified maps" category. And while I am trying to sort the stuff that was thrown into that "lucky bucket", what I encounter constantly are series of the weirdest fantasy maps usually with assorted heraldry (from the 2094 US elections over Minecraft kingdoms up to Great Caribbean Pirate Empires). Frankly, fictional heraldry+maps are not within Commons:Scope unless there is some educational angle to them, so this is one of my standard approaches. I'd suggest you should categorize all your made-up stuff under Category:User page images and put disclaimers that they are made up. That doesn't magically bring them into scope, but every contributing user is allowed to have a few personal or meta files flying around as long as they are clearly marked as such and don't go overboard. --Enyavar (talk) 14:46, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Delete no educational value → out of scope. --Jahobr (talk) 14:57, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not educational, notable, or related to any Wikimedia project. Wikipedia isn’t for things made up one day and neither is commons. Creating occasional nonsense in userspace is fine but uploading personal junk solely for that reason isn’t. Dronebogus (talk) 19:12, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 18:40, 31 October 2022 (UTC)