Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tres1394

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tres1394 (talk · contribs)

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also Commons:Deletion requests/File:BPD.jpg and (all files mostly uploaded on 24.03.2016):

• File:911flag3495 090911.jpg --> grabbed from (example) https://blogs.canisius.edu/the-dome/2011/09/12/canisius-commemorates-911-anniversary/ (2011) = http://blogs.canisius.edu/the-dome/wp-content/uploads/sites/13/2011/09/911flag3495_090911.jpg
• File:Dyngus Day Promotion.jpg --> grabbed from Internet + per exif a copyrighted work by "© Dylan Buyskes 2011"
• File:Dyngus Day Way.jpg --> grabbed from (example) http://stepoutbuffalo.com/things-dyngus-day/ (23.03.2016) = http://stepoutbuffalo.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/dyngus.jpg (identical exif)

---

• File:Engine 34.jpg
• File:Dyngus Day Promotion.jpg
• File:Dyngus Day Way.jpg
• File:911flag3495 090911.jpg

Gunnex (talk) 08:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

 Delete For File:Dyngus Day Promotion.jpg because it's a derivative work identical to this image posted over a year ago [1]. I'm not smart enough to detect the copyright notice but unless the uploader can provide proof of ownership I think that image has to be deleted.

 Delete For File:911flag3495 090911.jpg per nom, unless uploader can provide proof of ownership using COM:OTRS. However, at the bottom of the page provided by Gunnex [2] we read "Submitted by: Office of Public Relations", but I don't know if that's good enough information for the file to be kept with Template:PD-USGov. I would delete the file unless the uploader defends the image in a convincing manner.

 Delete For File:Dyngus Day Way.jpg per source found by Gunnex. That article was published the same day the file was uploaded to Commons. I assume the uploader read the article and then uploaded the image. I can't imagine that the article was written and the picture on Commons was found the same day of upload to add it to the article.

 Comment The other image, File:Engine 34.jpg, is the only one that I couldn't track down online from a source independent of Wikipedia or Commons, but given the pattern with the other pictures, I think the uploader must prove ownership or provide permission to upload that photo. I believe the assumption of good faith no longer applies to him or her. Dontreader (talk) 23:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

---

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)