Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Short

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Short (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Vanity gallery of his penis with no educational purposes. Out of Project scope.

Amitie 10g (talk) 21:20, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

+File:My surgery pics 038.JPG (already deleted earlier due to low quality) -- Common Good (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Weak  Keep for File:My pics 004.jpg which seems to have some possible medical illustrative potential. There may be one or two others with illustrative value that I wouldn't object to keeping if they were properly described and categorized. However the set as a whole seems poorly photographed, poorly described, and of little use, so  Delete the bulk. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:47, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted a bunch of them. Kept the rest. Subincision, hypospadias and CBT are in scope. However some of these images were poorly photographed (blurry, not centered) or near dupes. -- Common Good (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Short (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PENIS but with a twist. Most of these were previously nommed and kept on the grounds that some of them have educational value. I argue that this isn't true on the following grounds: The uploader claims that all these are own works, and from that follows that they are all self pics. These are all, or almost all, pics claiming to be depictions of hypospadias or a penile subincision. These are, honestly, mutually exclusive conditions: A person with a penile subincision has something resembling a hypospadias, though its formation is completely different. The same works in reverse. Because this uploader has labeled his images as both, we don't really know how to categorize these images. As such, there is no realistic educational use, because someone trying to make an educational use out of them will be getting deceived: Either this man has a hypospadias or he has a penile subincision. Even in the tremendously unlikely circumstance that he was born with a hypospadias that he had extended (slightly) by a penile subincision, these images are therefore useless as depictions of hypospadias, and questionable for depictions of a penile subincision.

—/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 03:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Indeed, the uploader seems to be confused in regard to the terms. Take, for example, File:Subincision142.JPG which refers to subincision in its file name but where at the same time the description refers to hypospadias. It was sorted into the category Category:Body modification by the uploader which would be fitting for subincision but not a hypospadias. In addition, these photographs are of low quality. Some of them are horribly blurred (like File:My pics 0031.JPG), none of them displays the phenomenon well much unlike the photographs that are used in the respective articles. None of them are used anywhere. Hence, I have deleted the whole lot as nominated per COM:SCOPE and COM:PENIS in particular. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]