Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Short
Vanity gallery of his penis with no educational purposes. Out of Project scope.
- File:My subincision 12.JPG
- File:My subincision 11.JPG
- File:My subincision 10.JPG
- File:My subincision 09.JPG
- File:My subincision 08.JPG
- File:My subincision 07.JPG
- File:My subincision 06.JPG
- File:My subincision 05.JPG
- File:My subincision 04.JPG
- File:My subincision 03.JPG
- File:My subincision 02.JPG
- File:My subincision 01.JPG
- File:My pics 016.JPG
- File:My pics 017.JPG
- File:My pics.JPG
- File:My pics 015.JPG
- File:My pics 014.JPG
- File:My pics 012.JPG
- File:My pics 013.JPG
- File:My pics 025.JPG
- File:My pics 024.JPG
- File:My pics 028.JPG
- File:My pics 019.JPG
- File:My pics 023.JPG
- File:My pics 021.JPG
- File:My pics 007.JPG
- File:My pics 049.jpg
- File:My pics 047.jpg
- File:My pics 046.jpg
- File:My pics 048.jpg
- File:My pics 043.jpg
- File:My pics 034.jpg
- File:My pics 040.jpg
- File:My pics 041.jpg
- File:My pics 039.jpg
- File:My pics 035.jpg
- File:My pics 004.jpg
- File:My pics 003.jpg
- File:My pics 011.jpg
- File:My pics 009.jpg
- File:My pics 008.jpg
- File:My pics 002.jpg
- File:My pics 001.jpg
Amitie 10g (talk) 21:20, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
+File:My surgery pics 038.JPG (already deleted earlier due to low quality) -- Common Good (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Weak Keep for File:My pics 004.jpg which seems to have some possible medical illustrative potential. There may be one or two others with illustrative value that I wouldn't object to keeping if they were properly described and categorized. However the set as a whole seems poorly photographed, poorly described, and of little use, so Delete the bulk. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:47, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Deleted a bunch of them. Kept the rest. Subincision, hypospadias and CBT are in scope. However some of these images were poorly photographed (blurry, not centered) or near dupes. -- Common Good (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
COM:PENIS but with a twist. Most of these were previously nommed and kept on the grounds that some of them have educational value. I argue that this isn't true on the following grounds: The uploader claims that all these are own works, and from that follows that they are all self pics. These are all, or almost all, pics claiming to be depictions of hypospadias or a penile subincision. These are, honestly, mutually exclusive conditions: A person with a penile subincision has something resembling a hypospadias, though its formation is completely different. The same works in reverse. Because this uploader has labeled his images as both, we don't really know how to categorize these images. As such, there is no realistic educational use, because someone trying to make an educational use out of them will be getting deceived: Either this man has a hypospadias or he has a penile subincision. Even in the tremendously unlikely circumstance that he was born with a hypospadias that he had extended (slightly) by a penile subincision, these images are therefore useless as depictions of hypospadias, and questionable for depictions of a penile subincision.
- File:Cockplay.jpg
- File:Estmming cock.jpg
- File:Estim.jpg
- File:Hypospadias190.JPG
- File:Hypospadias641.JPG
- File:Subincision142.JPG
- File:Hypospadias187.JPG
- File:Hypospadias421.JPG
- File:Hypospadias123.JPG
- File:My subincision.JPG
- File:My pics50.JPG
- File:My pics 51.JPG
- File:My pics 0031.JPG
- File:My pics 20.JPG
- File:My subincision 10.JPG
- File:My subincision 09.JPG
- File:My subincision 02.JPG
- File:My pics 017.JPG
- File:My pics 025.JPG
- File:My pics 049.jpg
- File:My pics 040.jpg
- File:My pics 039.jpg
- File:My pics 004.jpg
- File:My pics 003.jpg
- File:My pics 002.jpg
- File:My pics 001.jpg
—/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 03:05, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Indeed, the uploader seems to be confused in regard to the terms. Take, for example, File:Subincision142.JPG which refers to subincision in its file name but where at the same time the description refers to hypospadias. It was sorted into the category Category:Body modification by the uploader which would be fitting for subincision but not a hypospadias. In addition, these photographs are of low quality. Some of them are horribly blurred (like File:My pics 0031.JPG), none of them displays the phenomenon well much unlike the photographs that are used in the respective articles. None of them are used anywhere. Hence, I have deleted the whole lot as nominated per COM:SCOPE and COM:PENIS in particular. --AFBorchert (talk) 21:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)