Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SOLE DI PEDE

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Files uploaded by SOLE DI PEDE|year=2024|month=December|day=24}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Files uploaded by SOLE DI PEDE|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by SOLE DI PEDE}} at the end of today's log.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SOLE DI PEDE

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of SOLE DI PEDE (talk · contribs):

This is routine request for small photos without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photos are so small? Can you upload bigger versions, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload versions with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the files correctly? Taivo (talk) 10:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This DR troubles me. The introductory comment:

"Here are last remaining contributions of SOLE DI PEDE (talk · contribs)"
strongly implies that this is just cleaning up the last uploads of a known bad actor with a poor record. The fact is, however, that this editor has had only one upload deleted and that was not for copyvio, but because it was out of scope, so I think that Assume Good Faith should still apply.
With that said, they are small, they have weak descriptions, and some are not particularly good quality. File:Geyser del Tatio, Norte de Chile.jpg appears much smaller at the copyrighted site which Christian cites. The image that was previously deleted for scope also appears there. I'm going to register a weak keep. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:05, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion --Krd 18:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]