Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

French FOP problems of PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These photos are derivative of architecture/sculpture/signage in France. They appear too modern to be {{PD-old-70}} and do not appear de minimis to me. France's freedom of panorama exemptions are insufficient for Commons. Some of these files may qualify for transfer to a local wikipedia. Note: I requested in April that this user curate his photos and made him aware of FOP rules, but he seems to have declined to address the problem. Storkk (talk) 14:42, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly modern
Cette maison aurait été construite par Roger Le Flanchec (1915-1986) --Spendeau (talk) 19:47, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Epona géant des Près Villeneuve d'Ascq.jpg withdrawn per the below Storkk (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Mariage Epona - Guillem le contrebandier (2).jpg withdrawn per below Storkk (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Français: Bonjour Storkk je trouve originale votre demande de suppression des fichiers concernant le géant "Epona". Ce géant a été conçu et imaginé par moi-même et mes amis gestionnaires dans une association (le LCR des Prés) de Villeneuve d'Ascq. La réalisation en a été confiée à un plasticien, que nous avons rémunéré, et qui n'a en rien une propriété intellectuelle. J'ai du reste écrit un article concernant ce géant. Epona (géant de procession).

est un montage photographique réalisé par moi même pour en faire un poster destiné à l'association (LCR des Près).- Je l'ai repris pour mon article wiki comme "image-desc Épona", géante du quartier les Près, Cordialement. --Pierre André (talk) 15:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • English: Hello Storkk I find your singular request to delete files on the giant "Epona". This giant was designed and conceived by myself and my friends managers association (LCR des Prés) of Villeneuve d'Ascq. The realization was entrusted to a plastic, we paid, and who did nothing intellectual property. I have the rest written an article about this giant. Epona (procession of giant).

is a photographic montage by me to make a poster for the association (LCR des Prés) of Villeneuve d'Ascq ". I returned to my wiki article as "picture-desc Epona" giant of the area (LCR des Prés) of Villeneuve d'Ascq. Best regards.--Pierre André (talk) 15:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Architects include Valode & Pistre
En 1977 ... rénova l'édifice sur les plans des architectes Foyer Dodat et Villain. [1]
Constructed after 1977 w:Puy du Fou
Vulcania. Architect died in 2014
Patrig Ar Goarnig is still alive
P. de Hainaut died in 1951 - could undelete in 2022, but is out of scope as FOP-defaced
Possibly Alexandre-Mathurin_Pêche, if so Undelete in 2026
François_Cogné, undelete in 2023
Non-trivial signage
Copyright holders unknown - too modern to be {{PD-old-70}}? COM:PRP
Apparent repurposed WWII bunker.
Mills of unknown date
Constructed after 1910 (exact date unknown)
Destroyed in 1917 - but after reconstruction, artwork looks too modern to be PD
Various war memorials
Other
File:Paris Père Lachaise Clement Lebas.JPG -  Keep grave architect Ernest Georges Coquart (1831–1902), PD old. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC) withdrawn Storkk (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris Père Lachaise François Arago.JPG -  Keep grave architect Félix Duban (1797–1870), PD old. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC) withdrawn Storkk (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris Père Lachaise Statue d'Anatole de la Forge.JPG -  Keep grave artist Louis-Ernest Barrias (1841–1905), PD old. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC) withdrawn Storkk (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Paris Père Lachaise Anatole de la Forge.JPG -  Keep grave artist Louis-Ernest Barrias (1841–1905), PD old. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC) withdrawn Storkk (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


File:Pont-Aven Pension Gloanec.jpg withdrawn Storkk (talk) 17:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Storkk (talk) 12:51, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Havang(nl): you have asserted a number of files depict works that are PD-old, but you have not asserted a single death date or author identity. For a building erected in e.g. 1910, why do you think it is PD-old? Storkk (talk) 14:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't know what information User:Havang(nl) has access to, but assuming an average life time of 80 years and assuming that a building can be made at any time during the architect's lifetime, I'd expect that somewhere around half of all buildings from 1910 are PD-old-70. It may be better to nominate photos of such buildings separately so that the discussion is simplified if some architects are identified. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • If more than a couple architects are identified, I will consider splitting the DR. If only a few architects are identified but they are post-1945 deaths, I will add the files to the appropriate Undelete in... categories manually. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close. There are far too many images nominated here, many of which don't need to be deleted IMO (see above, I looked at the first 30 images and already many of them I deem acceptable). These images should be nominated separately or in smaller batches. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:13, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: FWIW, I strongly disagree with your "DM" arguments above... the photographs are clearly of the architecture, meaning they cannot be COM:DM (see criteria 6/7). Storkk (talk) 08:32, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, some may be borderline like File:Hautes-Pyrénées, La Mongie.jpg, but others are clearly not (like File:La Mongie.- La Chapelle Notre-Dame de La Mongie.jpg). --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk · contribs)'s files with other problems (e.g. non-French FOP)

[edit]
Likely modern work from the UK, no COM:FOP#United_Kingdom for 2-D graphic works
Derivative of recently deceased artists' work
No COM:FOP#South_Africa
No COM:FOP#Sri_Lanka
For the below, where the statues might be old, the paint work looks modern, and would also be copyrighted.
No COM:FOP#Romania
No COM:FOP#Lithuania
Note that this church is old, but the painting appears very modern
No COM:FOP#Latvia
COM:FOP#United_States only applies to buildings
No COM:FOP#Estonia
No COM:FOP#Greece
No COM:FOP#Italy
No COM:FOP#Japan for artwork
No COM:FOP#Cambodia
No COM:FOP#Mongolia
Out of scope after removal of copyrighted contents
File:Londres sur les traces de Jack the Ripper (4).jpg withdrawn, likely reproduction of bona fide old paper (see, e.g. [2])
File:Londres sur les traces de Jack the Ripper (2).jpg withdrawn, likely reproduction of bona fide old paper
File:Londres sur les traces de Jack the Ripper (1).jpg withdrawn, likely reproduction of bona fide old paper

Storkk (talk) 14:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No COM:FOP#Belgium

Architecture (possibly soon to be OK under new Belgian FOP rules?)
File:Strépy-Thieu.- Ascenseur (Belgique) (3).jpg
File:Strépy-Thieu.- Ascenseur (Belgique) (11).jpg
File:Strépy-Thieu.- Ascenseur (Belgique) (10).jpg
Monuments/statues
File:Zillebeke (3).JPG
File:Hill 60 Zwarteleenstraat Ieper (3).JPG
File:Hill 60 Zwarteleenstraat Ieper (2).jpg
File:La digue de Koksijde-1.jpg


Speedy close. There are far too many images nominated here, that can't be reviewed properly against the various criteria. These images should be nominated separately or in smaller batches. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:22, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: I find it hard to believe you are seriously suggesting ~400 separate nominations, especially considering that would likely break the uploader's talk page. Secondly, this is obviously not a "speedy" close candidate. Storkk (talk) 08:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Granted, ~400 separate nominations are also overwhelming, but looking at the various comments already posted above, there are numerous files that should not be deleted but now risk being deleted as a part of this mass nomination. OK, I will try to review the list above over the next few days. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 19:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: files with obvious FoP issues, kept about 125 files. If you feel some of them still should be deleted, please create separate DRs. Next time please don't create an unmanagable DR like this. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ↑ http://www.epeutnaerts.fr/galerie-photos/Festival des Epeutnaerts/Galerie Photos
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_PIERRE_ANDRE_LECLERCQ&oldid=877296508"