Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Meyvun
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras.
- File:Biju patnaik2.jpg
- File:Dilip tirkey2.jpg
- File:NIT Rourkela, Swimming Pool.jpg
- File:NIT Rourkela Quadrangle.jpg
- File:Biju Pattnaik Central Library.jpg
- File:Prankrushna Parija Auditorium.jpg
- File:Nit main building2.jpg
- File:IB River with Ib bridge in the background.jpg
- File:Laxmi Narayan Temple of Brajrajnagar.jpg
- File:Birla Temple of Brajrajnagar.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion, no significant reason doubt that the uploaders claims are true. These are all simple average quality pictures, mainly taken on cell phones over a number of years. I can readily accept that someone owns or has access to multiple devices over this period. I am not suprised that images from a variety of cellphones are a variety of resolutions, and most have been edited (cropped?) anyway. The dimensions are much bigger than I would expect to see if they were for instance copied off the institutions website. I didn't find any evidence of any of these elsewhere on the web. If one of these images turns up from another source then we should look again. We should assume good faith until there is evidence otherwise. --Tony Wills (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- File:Biju patnaik2.jpg is an odd one out, very poor quality perhaps a screen grab from a video. Used quite widely, but probably sourced from here. This is one that needs a closer look. --Tony Wills (talk) 09:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- Subject died in 1997 when uploader was apparently 5 years old (en:User:Meyvun), so ""own work" seems unlikely (perhaps he means he digitised it) - significant doubt on this one --Tony Wills (talk) 09:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- File:Biju patnaik2.jpg is an odd one out, very poor quality perhaps a screen grab from a video. Used quite widely, but probably sourced from here. This is one that needs a closer look. --Tony Wills (talk) 09:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- No valid reason for deletion, no significant reason doubt that the uploaders claims are true. These are all simple average quality pictures, mainly taken on cell phones over a number of years. I can readily accept that someone owns or has access to multiple devices over this period. I am not suprised that images from a variety of cellphones are a variety of resolutions, and most have been edited (cropped?) anyway. The dimensions are much bigger than I would expect to see if they were for instance copied off the institutions website. I didn't find any evidence of any of these elsewhere on the web. If one of these images turns up from another source then we should look again. We should assume good faith until there is evidence otherwise. --Tony Wills (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: I found copyrighted sources for the first two I looked at, so "own work" and AGF are not applicable here. . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:16, 7 August 2012 (UTC)