Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Leandro de Lemos
Files uploaded by Leandro de Lemos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work, please explain why public domain in Brazil.
- File:Sérgio Mendes Braga.jpg
- File:Pedro Rosso.jpg
- File:Alfredo Vieira de Souza.jpg
- File:Moacir Fontainha Sobrinho.jpg
- File:Vanderlei Geraldo de Assis.jpg
- File:Wilson Tatton Ramos.jpg
- File:Geraldo Zola Ribeiro de Melo.jpg
- File:Gerson Occhi.jpg
- File:Amauri Natividade Netto.jpg
- File:Edison Stecca.jpg
- File:Elias Assaf Maluf.jpg
- File:Onofro Corrêa Lima.jpg
- File:Felix Jorge Felix.jpg
- File:Humberto Benedito Filho.jpg
- File:Celso Alves Damasceno.jpg
- File:José da Silva Ribas.jpg
- File:Necy Alves de Azevedo.jpg
- File:José Lopes Silveira.jpg
- File:José Dutra Dias.jpg
- File:João Martins.jpg
- File:Mauro Pinto de Azevedo.jpg
- File:José Ferreira de Souza Chagas.jpg
- File:Agrícola Gomes Reis.jpg
- File:Gualter Lucas de Sant´Anna.jpg
- File:Avelino Augusto Silvestre.jpg
- File:Antônio Esperidião França.jpg
- File:Pedro Pereira de Paiva.jpg
- File:Miguel Marco Peres.jpg
- File:Sebastião Lopes de Carvalho.jpg
- File:Ramon Guerra Castro.jpg
- File:Manoel Rodrigues Maia.jpg
- File:Luiz Fernando Pinto.jpg
- File:José Ribeiro.jpg
- File:Vicente Joaquim Sanches.jpg
- File:Jacinto Rodrigues da Costa.jpg
- File:João Borges de Mattos.jpg
- File:Transcrição da Ata de Fundação da Loja Maçônica Fidelidade Mineira.png
- File:Ata de Fundação da Loja Maçônica Fidelidade Mineira.jpg
- File:Fidelidade Mineira.jpg
- File:Hughes-Stovin1.gif
- File:Hughes-Stovin2.gif
Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
I am creating an article about the oldest Masonic lodge in the State of Minas Gerais and, consequently, in the country (where one of the people who signed his letter was Saldanha Marinho, an important historical figure in Brazil) and which completes this year 150 years of uninterrupted existence. It emerged 20 years after the foundation of the city and develops important philanthropic work in the city and region. These photos are of the former presidents (called Venerable by Freemasons).
I would like to ask you to keep the images to allow the page to be assembled.
thanks Leandro de Lemos (talk) 23:04, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Leandro de Lemos: It's not the issue: you have to explain why images are public domain in Brazil. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
- All images of personalities are freely accessible to anyone interested, including copies already made in books. The Masonic Lodge Fidelidade Mineira provides the images even so that these people do not disappear from history. Many of the old Venerables do not have photos because they have no living relatives or their descendants do not have such old photos. Maintaining these photos on Wikipedia will serve to immortalize them for future stories of Freemasonry in Brazil. Documents posted as the Foundation Minutes are also freely accessible. The documents like "File: Motion of Applause from the Municipal Chamber for the 150th anniversary of Fidelidade Mineira.png" and others are also in the public domain, easily accessible and I made the link available on the page I am creating. If you are interested, please check the page still under development: https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio: Leandro_de_Lemos / Tests. If I need to send you a copy of the authorization of the images, all made available by Loja Maçônia Fidelidade Mineira. I only ask for a few days due to the advent of the Coronavirus that caused the Lodge to be closed by quarantine, as most Masons are part of the risk group. It should be noted that I am part of the board, so I have the endorsement of the store for this. If the above is not enough, I ask you to kindly guide me on how to proceed to make the images acceptable on Wikipedia. I'm really looking to be active and contribute with articles, and I wouldn't want to be making mistakes.Grateful.Leandro de Lemos (talk) 01:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Leandro de Lemos: "Freely accessible" doesn't mean they are free as we use this word here. By "free" they should have already been published under a free license e.g. on the Foundation Minutes. By "public domain" they should be old enough. What are they, please? Please reply above after each file name. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 05:16, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- All images of personalities are freely accessible to anyone interested, including copies already made in books. The Masonic Lodge Fidelidade Mineira provides the images even so that these people do not disappear from history. Many of the old Venerables do not have photos because they have no living relatives or their descendants do not have such old photos. Maintaining these photos on Wikipedia will serve to immortalize them for future stories of Freemasonry in Brazil. Documents posted as the Foundation Minutes are also freely accessible. The documents like "File: Motion of Applause from the Municipal Chamber for the 150th anniversary of Fidelidade Mineira.png" and others are also in the public domain, easily accessible and I made the link available on the page I am creating. If you are interested, please check the page still under development: https: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usu%C3%A1rio: Leandro_de_Lemos / Tests. If I need to send you a copy of the authorization of the images, all made available by Loja Maçônia Fidelidade Mineira. I only ask for a few days due to the advent of the Coronavirus that caused the Lodge to be closed by quarantine, as most Masons are part of the risk group. It should be noted that I am part of the board, so I have the endorsement of the store for this. If the above is not enough, I ask you to kindly guide me on how to proceed to make the images acceptable on Wikipedia. I'm really looking to be active and contribute with articles, and I wouldn't want to be making mistakes.Grateful.Leandro de Lemos (talk) 01:14, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment @Patrick Rogel: there was authorization, from the original owner via OTRS ticket 11348994, for use of these images. But the article where these images would be used has been eliminated as it does not meet the criteria of notoriety in force on Wikipedia Lusophone. In practice, they are merely an attempt to disclose individuals without encclopedic relevance, who commandedan encyclopedically irrelevant institution. That said, they fall outside the scope of the commons, and therefore should be eliminated, as proposed.--Leon saudanha (talk) 13:21, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 06:43, 13 June 2020 (UTC)