Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lamilli

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Files uploaded by Lamilli|year=2024|month=November|day=16}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Files uploaded by Lamilli|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lamilli}} at the end of today's log.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lamilli

[edit]

COM:EDUSE, COM:NUDITY and COM:SELFIE. No use in other projects and no apparent potential use. Common themes include nudity, piercings and tattoos.

--NoonIcarus (talk) 02:50, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per COM:SELFIE. These include pictures of people, places and events that are not remarkable, and as such unlikely to offer educational value to Commons. --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:34, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Inappropriately over wide deletion request. Looking over a sample, I see that the images are from accounts of multiple different Flickr photographers. The Commons uploader seems interested in images illustrating such subjects as body piercings and tattoos, which are within Commons scope. Quality and value of individual images varies; I might not object to deletion of certain individual or well selected groups of images, but this wholesale deletion seems inappropriate. Includes some good quality photos and images kept in previous deletion listings. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to note that only because the request is broad, I don't want to give the impression it is indiscriminate: I took care to prevent including files used in projects, kept in previous deletion requests (although I seem to have missed a few) or those that fell under narrow categories. I agree that many of the uploads are useful, including for events such as Category:Boobs on Bikes, Category:Folsom Street Fair 2005, Category:Exxxotica New Jersey 2008, Category:Nudes-A-Poppin' 2008 and Category:World Naked Bike Ride London 2013. My main concern is that there are files that are not "significantly different from existing files", and as such are unlikely to contribute to the project. I have striken down files kept in previous requests, and wouldn't mind to withdraw other files from the request if there is a specific rationale. --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Overly broad, looking at a few, they are in very narrow categories that are under represented. If you don't like people looking at body parts, nominating them just gets more people to look at them with the Streisand Effect. --RAN (talk) 23:41, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I couldn't care less if people look at body parts or not, specially since Wikimedia is not censored After all, these are files that are not used in other projects. My concern is that the listed files are not useful to the project. --NoonIcarus (talk) 13:30, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Closing early, clearly no support for deletion of this large diverse catch-all. (Does not prejudge renomination of individual images for more specific reasons.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]