Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jack60815
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
These are all claimed to be selfies. That claim is absurd in the first case and very unlikely. Even if true, it is not clear that the copyright holder has given permission. Almost all of this editor's other images have been deleted for similar reasons.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- 照片皆為當事者使用CC-BY-SA 4.0授權並同意維基使用者Jac60815上傳至維基共享資源。 Jack60815 (talk) 13:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Jack60815 我不会用繁体，就用简体打字吧。我建议你让这些图片的当事人通过志工回覆團隊直接发电邮授权，那会是最好以及最没有争议的办法，可以避免下次出现图片被删的情况。 SBS6577P (talk) 13:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- 先謝謝您為我翻譯成英文，由於當事人們對於維基不是這麼熟悉，如果還是被刪除就算了。 Jack60815 (talk) 14:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Jack60815 我不会用繁体，就用简体打字吧。我建议你让这些图片的当事人通过志工回覆團隊直接发电邮授权，那会是最好以及最没有争议的办法，可以避免下次出现图片被删的情况。 SBS6577P (talk) 13:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: For reference for others and the nominator, the messages in the Imgur photos linked in the links for the photos are as follows: "I, (insert name), permit the uploading of my portrait photo to Wikimedia Commons by user Jack60815, and that I allow said photo to be license under the terms of CC-BY-SA 4.0., which I think can be considered as permission is given. That being said I will not give an exact keep/delete vote since the first point about the selfies is valid. SBS6577P (talk) 13:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, but please note that anyone could have posted that message. Forgeries are common here. Note also that there is nothing in that statement which says that the subject person was the photographer. That is why our rules require that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- 这里可以给一个例子：比方说董昱汝在Instagram发的帖子的第四张图片，由于董与同行的李、陈二人皆于图中，而版权不属于发布者，而可能是实际进行拍摄的陈室颖或Posa Huang。
- ----
- Here's an example: Like the fourth photo of Dong Yuru's post on Instagram, Due to Dong, Li Zuoheng (Lee Tsohen) and Chen Wenyue (Canelle Chen) are all in this photo, so the photographer might be the Posa Huang or Chen Shiyi instead of publisher. CreeperDigital 12:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you, but please note that anyone could have posted that message. Forgeries are common here. Note also that there is nothing in that statement which says that the subject person was the photographer. That is why our rules require that the actual copyright holder must send a free license using VRT. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; furthermore, the subject of the photo (unless it's a selfie) cannot declare the license for it – only the copyright holder , which is almost always the photographer. VRT is required here and not just some random post on imgur. —holly {chat} 18:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)