Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fujimori5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fujimori5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of copyright advertising posters and panels. Outside the scope of de minimis.

DAJF (talk) 13:12, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fujimori5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus CC claims. No free license at YouTube source; uploader (non-reviewer) added bogus review template (see contribs littered with "License review by non-image-reviewers" tags)

Эlcobbola talk 17:43, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note, Miss Magazine files are from the same source that had a CC license. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miss Magazine 2019 Grand Prix Final.jpg Minoraxtalk 23:29, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, I found a version of the YT video that had the CC license and I've passed a license review for the original image (linked above by Minorax). As for another set of images, I found this, which also shows that it was released under a CC license, regardless of whether the license reviews were done appropriately. As for whether or not we should keep them (regardless of copyright status; I couldn't find a CC claim for this image, for instance), I'm !voting delete for these:
I see little reason to keep a bunch of photographs of models when they're all very low quality and a different image would likely do their job a lot better. The other images aren't great either, but at least they might have some educational value in depicting the article's subject. Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:55, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Elcobbola:  Keep as per this disccussion mentioned by Minorax CC license is irrevocable. also see this tag
Please note: This image was originally uploaded to Wikimedia Commons licensed as noted. The copyright holder has since changed the licensing to be more restrictive. Creative Commons licenses are non-revocable. See the Creative Commons FAQ on revoking licensing.
Templates:Change-of-license/en
العربيَّة | català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | հայերեն | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | svenska | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | +/−
tag, and
When this file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, it was available from Flickr under the stated license. The Flickr user has since stopped distributing the file under this license. As Creative Commons licenses cannot be revoked in this manner, the file is still free to use under the terms of the license specified. See the Creative Commons FAQ on revoking licensing.

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ 正體中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

tag, and this license reviewer bot page, which records and archives license info. Puramyun31 (talk) 13:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
it's not bogus, when some of the images are screenshots of videos that were reviewed by a bot. the uploader copied the LR tag from the source file. that doesnt make the tag invalid.--RZuo (talk) 23:22, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: discussion shows that the license was changed afterwards but it is irrevocable. There were some votes about deleting some of the images due to low value but as I see, some of them are used in articles and some others show people that also have articles about them. So, kept. --rubin16 (talk) 09:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Fujimori5&oldid=606714564"