This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Now nominating all uploads from this user so they can all be evaluated. @Freyjadour: this is not an attack, if they are kept it is less likely any of them will be renominated in the future. - Alexis Jazz13:56, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"The file is the exactly the way it was uploaded on flicker, without any edits and the likes. Whenever a file is uploaded online, it gets a somewhat lower resolution from the original. Likewise, it gets a different resolution when it was uploaded here in the wiki. Furthermore, I, on the the other hand, was the one who downloaded the file itself in flicker as Juliochesare. I have the original copy of the file and I'm allowing that this file could be used for free purposes. If in doubt in any way, I could present proofs as needed. --Freyjadour"
@Alexis Jazz: Okay, aside from the obvious reason that I was there when I took them, I've acquired the photos by using my phone and I intend to only use them for entertainment purposes and as such share them. I don't know how else to go as detailed as that unless you specify and oh and also, these images were reviewed for almost a year already and were approved by the wiki, so why bring this up now though? When they were posted in flickr, they may seem off then appear indifferent when uploaded here in the wiki. I apologize for those, I'm just so confused with everything happening all of a sudden. Freyjadour (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Hello sorry, do you follow? There are a lot of cases and instances that whenever I, and anybody for that matter, upload images to flickr, our photos lose both chroma saturation and contrast. Likewise, upon uploading the images here and somebody checks, they appear different to them and assume that they may be flickrwashed if that's the term. And as aforementioned above, these were around for almost entirely a year and some did reach that extent and went beyond because they were already reviewed and approved. This does not make a lot of sense and this was only brought up when an anonymous user allegedly said that the previous image that is now deleted was flickrwashed. I was indeed aware of his allegations; however, I had no time before to defend my side and explain everything, and maybe that's why the photo was even deleted since no defense was provided for the uploader. I'm just so surprised with all these notifications taking up my inbox when in fact prior to making rash actions such as nominating them for deletion, this should have been discussed properly. Thanks Freyjadour (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Freyjadour: Don't forget to sign your messages with ~~~~. I see you corrected it now.
Thanks, this is helping. Flickrwashing doesn't mean what you think it means. It means taking some copyrighted photo, uploading it to Flickr and selecting a free license on Flickr when the image in fact has none.
Please upload the original photos from your phone. You may be able to use the Wikimedia Commons app for that, or you can just visit the site on your phone. Ask at the COM:Help desk if you have any questions. We can do cropping and any other needed corrections. This will remove any copyright doubts and improve the quality of the photos.
The nomination for deletion was required as Patrick had tagged the photo with "copyvio" which doesn't allow any discussion. It is not allowed to just remove copyvio and leave it like that. I am actually allowing discussion with this action. - Alexis Jazz15:42, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Freyjadour: nobody is questioning the Flickr license having been reviewed. This was done by a computer, not a human being. It means the image was available on Flickr with said license. Patrick Rogel suspected the user who uploaded it to Flickr (in this case you) didn't have the rights for the image. Your "proof" has no meaning. It would be awesome if you could upload the original photos in full resolution from your phone though. - Alexis Jazz15:52, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: As what said earlier if you've been keeping track, the images were saved digitally in the computer. The copies from the phone were omitted since these were taken way back and were taking up a lot of space. Are there any possible ways? ^^ Freyjadour (talk) 15:57, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Freyjadour: Omitted? You mean you deleted them from your phone? What a shame, I don't know what software you used but a lot must have been lost. There are no bigger files on your computer anymore either? You can contact OTRS. I will convert the deletion templates to {{OTRS pending}} if you do that. - Alexis Jazz16:03, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Yeah, it really is a shame, I never thought it would come to this. Okay, could you guide me through to what I have to do? I'll send an email to this OTRS and then? Freyjadour (talk) 16:10, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Freyjadour: Send the email to OTRS, tell me you have done so and I'll convert the deletion templates. If OTRS has any questions they will mail you back. This could a while, the current backlog is over 2 months. By the way. what I meant with it being a shame was that the original photos probably had much better quality/detail, which is now lost. - Alexis Jazz16:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
