Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Eduardomanuel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduardomanuel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

(Part I) Photos/paintings/drawings etc. about Argentine politicans: unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Historical photos may be in public domain but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 23:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Eduardomanuel (talk · contribs) (Part II)

(Part II) Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP: Panoramio-grabber (see User talk:Eduardomanuel for details), all uploads before and/or after these one were grabbed from several copyrighted Panoramio-accounts.

Gunnex (talk) 23:08, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Eduardomanuel (talk · contribs) (Part III)

(Part III) Argentine works, published/created or sourced with (as indicated): see below, licensed with {{PD-AR-Photo}}, not in PD in Argentina at COM:URAA-date 01.01.1996 and copyrighted in US +95 years.

1973
1975
1976
1981
1983
1984

Gunnex (talk) 23:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


  • The photos in part III are problematic, so those should probably be deleted. If the other ones qualify for PD-AR-Photo, then the licenses should be fixed, not deleted. Given the respective laws, most any photo published before 1971 is likely PD in both Argentina and the U.S., so even if those are erroneously claimed "own work", they should just be corrected, not nominated for deletion. If these are paintings or drawings, then PD-AR-Photo would not apply and the images could be more questionable. For example... there's really no good rationale to delete File:Gobernador del Chaco, P. Gómez.JPG; that seems to be an 1800s photo and exceedingly unlikely to still be under copyright. If there is specific information that photos came from previously-unpublished archives or something, then reconsider, but most of that kind of thing was published. So, many of part 1 should probably be corrected and not deleted. Part 2.... errm. Lacking EXIF or inconsistent sizes are not reasons for deletion, but if there was a pattern of behavior of taking images from websites, then yes that would probably change around the normal assumption of good faith. At least one of those does have a Panoramio watermark, which would fit with the deletion rationale. So, I guess the images in part II and part III should probably go; most of the ones in Part 1 should be evaluated per PD-AR-Photo before being deleted. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted those in part one and closed this without realizing that it was all one DR -- the section heads are confusing. I have removed my closure. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Per Carl Lindberg (see User talk:Jameslwoodward, I have undeleted all of the images above which I deleted, so this can start fresh. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming these files as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host them on Commons FASTILY 07:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Eduardomanuel&oldid=119167092"